Megan Still
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Co-authors
- Justin Newton ScanlanPhilip B. WardRobyn LangdonMichael H. ConnorsStanley V. CattsJohan PalludGrant CameronAlexandre Roux
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers)Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers)Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (7 papers)
- Cited by
- Occupational TherapyOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementGeneral Health Professions
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaFrance
In The Last Decade
Megan Still
44 papers receiving 916 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- General Health Professions 337
- Clinical Psychology 201
- Social Psychology 157
- Psychiatry and Mental health 153
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 140
Countries citing papers authored by Megan Still
This map shows the geographic impact of Megan Still's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Megan Still with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Megan Still more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Megan Still
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Megan Still. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Megan Still. The network helps show where Megan Still may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Megan Still
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Megan Still. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Megan Still based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Megan Still. Megan Still is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 155 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Megan Still
Megan Still is a scholar working on Genetics, Health Informatics and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 51 papers that have together received 949 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers) and Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (92 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (140 citations) and General Health Professions (337 citations). Megan Still has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and France. Frequent co-authors include Justin Newton Scanlan, Philip B. Ward, Robyn Langdon, Michael H. Connors, Stanley V. Catts, Johan Pallud, Grant Cameron, Alexandre Roux, Harvey Whiteford and Geoff Waghorn. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Scientific Reports and Journal of neurosurgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.