Megan Ming Francis

571 total citations
11 papers, 257 citations indexed

About

Megan Ming Francis is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and History. According to data from OpenAlex, Megan Ming Francis has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 257 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 3 papers in History. Recurrent topics in Megan Ming Francis's work include Race, History, and American Society (9 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers) and American Political and Social Dynamics (3 papers). Megan Ming Francis is often cited by papers focused on Race, History, and American Society (9 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers) and American Political and Social Dynamics (3 papers). Megan Ming Francis collaborates with scholars based in United States. Megan Ming Francis's co-authors include Michael Dawson, Katherine Beckett and John Fabian Witt and has published in prestigious journals such as The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Law & Society Review and Public Culture.

In The Last Decade

Megan Ming Francis

11 papers receiving 230 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Megan Ming Francis United States	7	177	98	26	25	23	11	257
Sandra R. Levitsky United States	6	115 0.6×	57 0.6×	61 2.3×	40 1.6×	31 1.3×	17	219
Stewart Burns United States	5	144 0.8×	105 1.1×	31 1.2×	9 0.4×	60 2.6×	14	279
Lynne M. Woehrle United States	7	174 1.0×	95 1.0×	21 0.8×	53 2.1×	9 0.4×	21	265
Heidi Swarts United States	6	188 1.1×	145 1.5×	60 2.3×	20 0.8×	4 0.2×	8	310
Steinar Stjernø Norway	3	132 0.7×	108 1.1×	40 1.5×	7 0.3×	6 0.3×	3	254
D’Ann Campbell United States	7	160 0.9×	114 1.2×	13 0.5×	83 3.3×	14 0.6×	27	306
Gary M. Reich United States	11	200 1.1×	168 1.7×	17 0.7×	9 0.4×	25 1.1×	25	300
Annette Schnabel Germany	9	161 0.9×	94 1.0×	14 0.5×	23 0.9×	5 0.2×	32	225
Yunas Samad United Kingdom	9	175 1.0×	128 1.3×	16 0.6×	34 1.4×	9 0.4×	19	259
Dominic J. Capeci United States	9	244 1.4×	47 0.5×	30 1.2×	19 0.8×	4 0.2×	31	324

Countries citing papers authored by Megan Ming Francis

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Megan Ming Francis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Megan Ming Francis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Megan Ming Francis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Megan Ming Francis

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Megan Ming Francis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Megan Ming Francis. The network helps show where Megan Ming Francis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Megan Ming Francis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Megan Ming Francis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Megan Ming Francis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Megan Ming Francis. Megan Ming Francis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

Francis, Megan Ming. (2022). Can Black Lives Matter within U.S. Democracy?. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 699(1). 186–199. 5 indexed citations

Francis, Megan Ming & John Fabian Witt. (2021). Movement Capture or Movement Strategy? A Critical Race History Exchange on the Beginnings of Brown v. Board. eYLS (Yale Law School). 31(2). 10. 1 indexed citations

Francis, Megan Ming, et al.. (2021). Black Lives Matter in Historical Perspective. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 17(1). 441–458. 36 indexed citations

Francis, Megan Ming & John Fabian Witt. (2020). Movement Capture or Movement Strategy? A Critical Race History Exchange on the Beginnings of Brown v. Board. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

Beckett, Katherine & Megan Ming Francis. (2020). The Origins of Mass Incarceration: The Racial Politics of Crime and Punishment in the Post–Civil Rights Era. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 16(1). 433–452. 28 indexed citations

Francis, Megan Ming. (2019). The Price of Civil Rights: Black Lives, White Funding, and Movement Capture. Law & Society Review. 53(1). 275–309. 46 indexed citations

Francis, Megan Ming. (2018). The Strange Fruit of American Political Development. Politics Groups and Identities. 6(1). 128–137. 16 indexed citations

Francis, Megan Ming. (2016). We the People: The Civil Rights Revolution. By Bruce Ackerman. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2014. 432 pp. $35.00 hardcover.. Law & Society Review. 50(3). 804–806. 6 indexed citations

Dawson, Michael & Megan Ming Francis. (2015). Black Politics and the Neoliberal Racial Order. Public Culture. 28(1). 23–62. 43 indexed citations

10.

Francis, Megan Ming. (2014). Civil Rights and the Making of the Modern American State. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 73 indexed citations

11.

Francis, Megan Ming. (2011). The Battle for the Hearts and Minds of America. Souls. 13(1). 46–71. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact