Megan MacGarvie
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 1%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Accounting top 5%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 5%
- Co-authors
- Iain CockburnShulamit KahnJeffrey L. FurmanPetra MoserElisabeth MuellerXing LiPamina KoenigIna Ganguli
- Topics
- Innovation Policy and R&D (10 papers)Intellectual Property and Patents (7 papers)Firm Innovation and Growth (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaManagement ScienceResearch Policy
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaFrance
In The Last Decade
Megan MacGarvie
24 papers receiving 729 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Economics and Econometrics 490
- Management of Technology and Innovation 292
- Strategy and Management 262
- Accounting 148
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 94
Countries citing papers authored by Megan MacGarvie
This map shows the geographic impact of Megan MacGarvie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Megan MacGarvie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Megan MacGarvie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Megan MacGarvie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Megan MacGarvie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Megan MacGarvie. The network helps show where Megan MacGarvie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Megan MacGarvie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Megan MacGarvie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Megan MacGarvie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Megan MacGarvie. Megan MacGarvie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 30 | |
| 7 | 34 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 107 | |
| 12 | 38 | |
| 13 | 113 | |
| 14 | WHEN THE PILL PEDDLERS MET THE SCIENTISTS: the Antecedents and Implications of Early Collaborations between US Pharmaceutical Firms and Universities | 2 |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 64 | |
| 17 | Entry and Patenting in the Software Industry | 5 |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 135 | |
| 20 | International Trade and Knowledge Diffusion: A survey of recent empirical evidence | 2 |
About Megan MacGarvie
Megan MacGarvie is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 783 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation Policy and R&D (10 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (7 papers) and Firm Innovation and Growth (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (292 citations), Economics and Econometrics (490 citations) and Strategy and Management (262 citations). Megan MacGarvie has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Iain Cockburn, Shulamit Kahn, Jeffrey L. Furman, Petra Moser, Elisabeth Mueller, Xing Li, Pamina Koenig, Ina Ganguli, Xing Li and Caroline Fry. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Management Science and Research Policy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.