Megan Evans

3.1k total citations
44 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

Megan Evans is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Global and Planetary Change and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Megan Evans has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 20 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 17 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Megan Evans's work include Environmental Conservation and Management (20 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (17 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (10 papers). Megan Evans is often cited by papers focused on Environmental Conservation and Management (20 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (17 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (10 papers). Megan Evans collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Megan Evans's co-authors include Martine Maron, Hugh P. Possingham, James Watson, Ascelin Gordon, Joseph W. Bull, Carina Wyborn, Philip Gibbons, Christopher Cvitanovic, Kerrie A. Wilson and Richard A. Fuller and has published in prestigious journals such as Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Conservation Biology and BioScience.

In The Last Decade

Megan Evans

42 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Megan Evans Australia 25 993 892 761 748 549 44 2.1k
Niels Strange Denmark 28 1.3k 1.3× 718 0.8× 403 0.5× 981 1.3× 533 1.0× 74 2.3k
Joseph W. Bull United Kingdom 36 1.6k 1.6× 2.4k 2.7× 651 0.9× 2.0k 2.6× 717 1.3× 87 3.5k
Elizabeth A. Law Australia 26 1.5k 1.5× 359 0.4× 781 1.0× 465 0.6× 609 1.1× 45 2.6k
Frank Wätzold Germany 26 1.2k 1.2× 722 0.8× 369 0.5× 1.0k 1.4× 415 0.8× 90 2.3k
Angela Cropper United States 4 787 0.8× 393 0.4× 462 0.6× 367 0.5× 320 0.6× 4 1.9k
Jon Hutton United Kingdom 15 1.9k 1.9× 683 0.8× 1.3k 1.7× 566 0.8× 449 0.8× 23 3.3k
Camilla Sandström Sweden 31 1.6k 1.7× 520 0.6× 1.0k 1.4× 257 0.3× 382 0.7× 148 3.1k
Nigel Dudley 3 1.0k 1.0× 486 0.5× 686 0.9× 312 0.4× 355 0.6× 4 1.9k
Margaret B. Holland United States 17 1.9k 1.9× 444 0.5× 652 0.9× 730 1.0× 206 0.4× 27 2.6k
Carly N. Cook Australia 33 1.5k 1.5× 680 0.8× 1.5k 2.0× 450 0.6× 781 1.4× 86 3.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Megan Evans

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Megan Evans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Megan Evans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Megan Evans more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Megan Evans

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Megan Evans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Megan Evans. The network helps show where Megan Evans may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Megan Evans

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Megan Evans. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Megan Evans based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Megan Evans. Megan Evans is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Macintosh, Andrew, Megan Evans, Don Butler, et al.. (2025). Reply to: National-scale datasets underestimate vegetation recovery in Australian human-induced native forest regeneration carbon sequestration projects. Communications Earth & Environment. 6(1).
2.
Bell‐James, Justine, Carla L. Archibald, Claudia Benham, et al.. (2024). Not all conservation “policy” is created equally: When does a policy give rise to legally binding obligations?. Conservation Letters. 17(6). 1 indexed citations
3.
McDonald, Matt, Susan Park, Anthony Burke, et al.. (2024). Ecological Crises and Ecopolitics Research in Australia. Australian Journal of Politics & History. 71(1). 147–165. 1 indexed citations
4.
Macintosh, Andrew, Don Butler, Pablo Larraondo, et al.. (2024). Australian human-induced native forest regeneration carbon offset projects have limited impact on changes in woody vegetation cover and carbon removals. Communications Earth & Environment. 5(1). 24 indexed citations
5.
Macintosh, Andrew, et al.. (2024). Non-compliance and under-performance in Australian human-induced regeneration projects. The Rangeland Journal. 46(5). 3 indexed citations
6.
Ho, David T., Patrick Lamers, Masahiro Sugiyama, et al.. (2024). Navigating the obstacles of carbon-negative technologies. One Earth. 7(9). 1471–1476. 2 indexed citations
7.
Maron, Martine, Fabien Quétier, Kerry ten Kate, et al.. (2023). ‘Nature positive’ must incorporate, not undermine, the mitigation hierarchy. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 8(1). 14–17. 35 indexed citations
8.
Evans, Megan. (2023). Peer Support Services Reaching People with Schizophrenia. 5 indexed citations
9.
Evans, Megan. (2023). Backloading to extinction: Coping with values conflict in the administration of Australia's federal biodiversity offset policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 82(2). 228–247. 17 indexed citations
10.
Witt, Bradd, et al.. (2022). Community perceptions of carbon farming: A case study of the semi-arid Mulga Lands in Queensland, Australia. Journal of Rural Studies. 96. 78–88. 11 indexed citations
11.
Bull, Joseph W., et al.. (2022). A step change needed to secure a nature-positive future—Is it in reach?. One Earth. 5(6). 589–592. 2 indexed citations
12.
Evans, Megan. (2021). Re-conceptualizing the role(s) of science in biodiversity conservation. Environmental Conservation. 48(3). 151–160. 32 indexed citations
13.
Wyborn, Carina & Megan Evans. (2021). Conservation needs to break free from global priority mapping. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 5(10). 1322–1324. 112 indexed citations
14.
Moon, Katie, Deborah Blackman, Vanessa M. Adams, et al.. (2019). Expanding the role of social science in conservation through an engagement with philosophy, methodology, and methods. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 10(3). 294–302. 100 indexed citations
15.
Maron, Martine, Susie Brownlie, Joseph W. Bull, et al.. (2018). The many meanings of no net loss in environmental policy. Nature Sustainability. 1(1). 19–27. 154 indexed citations
17.
Martin, Nigel, Megan Evans, John Rice, Sumit Lodhia, & Philip Gibbons. (2016). Using offsets to mitigate environmental impacts of major projects: A stakeholder analysis. Journal of Environmental Management. 179. 58–65. 16 indexed citations
18.
Evans, Megan, et al.. (2015). Clear consideration of costs, condition and conservation benefits yields better planning outcomes. Biological Conservation. 191. 716–727. 39 indexed citations
19.
Evans, Megan, Hugh P. Possingham, & Kerrie A. Wilson. (2011). What to do in the face of multiple threats? Incorporating dependencies within a return on investment framework for conservation. Diversity and Distributions. 17(3). 437–450. 40 indexed citations
20.
Watson, James, Megan Evans, Josie Carwardine, et al.. (2010). The Capacity of Australia's Protected‐Area System to Represent Threatened Species. Conservation Biology. 25(2). 324–332. 89 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026