Megan Clayton

772 total citations
9 papers, 481 citations indexed

About

Megan Clayton is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Plant Science and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Megan Clayton has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 481 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in General Health Professions, 3 papers in Plant Science and 2 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Megan Clayton's work include Organic Food and Agriculture (2 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (2 papers) and Urban Agriculture and Sustainability (2 papers). Megan Clayton is often cited by papers focused on Organic Food and Agriculture (2 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (2 papers) and Urban Agriculture and Sustainability (2 papers). Megan Clayton collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Megan Clayton's co-authors include Julian Savulescu, Bennett Foddy, Roni Neff, Melissa N. Poulsen, Keshia M. Pollack, Shannon Frattaroli, Anne Palmer, Katherine Clegg Smith, Margaret E. Ensminger and Lainie Rutkow and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and British Journal of Sports Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Megan Clayton

7 papers receiving 433 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Megan Clayton United States 6 180 163 84 67 55 9 481
Mariarosaria Savarese Italy 14 49 0.3× 47 0.3× 22 0.3× 15 0.2× 40 0.7× 38 479
José Manuel Bermudo Ávila Spain 20 243 1.4× 18 0.1× 46 0.5× 20 0.3× 7 0.1× 41 1.1k
Agnieszka Jaszczak Poland 14 29 0.2× 67 0.4× 9 0.1× 72 1.1× 9 0.2× 48 428
Jennifer Jo Thompson United States 12 49 0.3× 48 0.3× 24 0.3× 11 0.2× 64 1.2× 34 528
Andrea Carlson United States 18 68 0.4× 31 0.2× 18 0.2× 11 0.2× 20 0.4× 48 1.0k
Sylvie de Grosbois Canada 7 87 0.5× 51 0.3× 28 0.3× 300 4.5× 15 0.3× 11 692
Shuwen Wang China 16 286 1.6× 45 0.3× 9 0.1× 15 0.2× 28 0.5× 39 672
Maricarmen Vizcaíno United States 13 32 0.2× 80 0.5× 20 0.2× 8 0.1× 11 0.2× 25 534
Neil Hancock United Kingdom 16 49 0.3× 18 0.1× 40 0.5× 42 0.6× 6 0.1× 38 974
Melissa Ceuterick Belgium 8 267 1.5× 36 0.2× 15 0.2× 9 0.1× 3 0.1× 36 454

Countries citing papers authored by Megan Clayton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Megan Clayton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Megan Clayton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Megan Clayton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Megan Clayton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Megan Clayton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Megan Clayton. The network helps show where Megan Clayton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Megan Clayton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Megan Clayton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Megan Clayton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Megan Clayton. Megan Clayton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Clayton, Megan, et al.. (2025). Building the framework for bioprinted human heart tissue: recent developments and future prospects. Regenerative Medicine. 20(9). 409–430.
2.
Payne, Julianne, et al.. (2024). Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patient Navigation for Health-Related Social Needs. Family & Community Health. 47(3). 239–247.
3.
Glasgow, LaShawn, et al.. (2023). Key insights on multisector community partnerships from real-world efforts to address social determinants of health. Evaluation and Program Planning. 99. 102298–102298. 7 indexed citations
4.
Barry, Colleen L., et al.. (2016). Agricultural Exceptionalism at the State Level: Characterization of Wage and Hour Laws for U.S. Farmworkers. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1–22. 15 indexed citations
5.
Clayton, Megan, Katherine Clegg Smith, Keshia M. Pollack, Roni Neff, & Lainie Rutkow. (2016). U.S. Food System Working Conditions as an Issue of Food Safety. NEW SOLUTIONS A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy. 26(4). 599–621. 1 indexed citations
6.
Clayton, Megan, Shannon Frattaroli, Anne Palmer, & Keshia M. Pollack. (2015). The Role of Partnerships in U.S. Food Policy Council Policy Activities. PLoS ONE. 10(4). e0122870–e0122870. 32 indexed citations
7.
Clayton, Megan, Katherine Clegg Smith, Roni Neff, Keshia M. Pollack, & Margaret E. Ensminger. (2015). Listening to food workers: Factors that impact proper health and hygiene practice in food service. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health. 21(4). 314–327. 31 indexed citations
8.
Poulsen, Melissa N., et al.. (2015). A systematic review of urban agriculture and food security impacts in low-income countries. Food Policy. 55. 131–146. 191 indexed citations
9.
Savulescu, Julian, Bennett Foddy, & Megan Clayton. (2004). Why we should allow performance enhancing drugs in sport. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 38(6). 666–670. 204 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026