Meg Waraczynski

630 citations
29 papers · 520 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Meg Waraczynski

28 papers receiving 511 citations

Peers

Meg Waraczynski
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 269
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 232
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 49
  • Neurology 49
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 78
Replace Phoebe Collins with:
Phoebe Collins United Kingdom
Rebecca Boehme Sweden
Jonathan Wood United Kingdom
Marcos Economides United Kingdom
Evan Shelby United States
Clarence E. Smith United States
Kwangyeol Baek United Kingdom
Samuel Zorowitz United States
Peggy Postma United Kingdom
Koji Toda Japan
Meg Waraczynski relative to Phoebe Collins United Kingdom Phoebe Collins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Phoebe Collins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meg Waraczynski

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meg Waraczynski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meg Waraczynski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meg Waraczynski more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meg Waraczynski

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meg Waraczynski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meg Waraczynski. The network helps show where Meg Waraczynski may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Meg Waraczynski, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meg Waraczynski Line = papers co-authored together Meg Waraczynski links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199670
2 200557
3 198745
4 198836
5 199130
6 198723
7 201821
8 200020
9 199820
10 199019
11 201618
12 199118
13 200317
14 198815
15 201012
16 199811
17 199511
18 199211
19 200011
20 200710

About Meg Waraczynski

Meg Waraczynski is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Neurology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 29 papers that have together received 520 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (15 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (5 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (5 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (269 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (232 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (49 citations), Neurology (49 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (78 citations). Meg Waraczynski has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include James R. Stellar, John E. Calamari, Peter Shizgal, Joanna Mazur, C. R. Gallistel, F. Scott Hall, Catherine W. M. Chan, Ashley Acheson, Matthew R. Leon and Joel M. Kaplan. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioural Brain Research, Physiology & Behavior, Brain Research, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews and Behavioral Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact