M.C. Ploem

819 total citations
53 papers, 253 citations indexed

About

M.C. Ploem is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, M.C. Ploem has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 253 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 11 papers in General Health Professions and 11 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in M.C. Ploem's work include Ethics in Clinical Research (20 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (10 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (10 papers). M.C. Ploem is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in Clinical Research (20 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (10 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (10 papers). M.C. Ploem collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. M.C. Ploem's co-authors include Raoul C. M. Hennekam, Colin Mitchell, Marieke Bak, Paul Glasziou, Hanno L. Tan, Anna Mae Scott, Simon Kolstoe, Marieke T. Blom, Dick L. Willems and Sjef Gevers and has published in prestigious journals such as BMJ, Human Reproduction and Patient Education and Counseling.

In The Last Decade

M.C. Ploem

42 papers receiving 241 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M.C. Ploem Netherlands 10 130 47 43 36 32 53 253
Andrea Martani Switzerland 10 126 1.0× 20 0.4× 61 1.4× 16 0.4× 23 0.7× 31 296
Joel E. Pacyna United States 8 97 0.7× 57 1.2× 62 1.4× 17 0.5× 36 1.1× 26 206
Kadija Ferryman United States 8 124 1.0× 90 1.9× 53 1.2× 15 0.4× 26 0.8× 21 333
Melissa McNeil United States 10 96 0.7× 56 1.2× 131 3.0× 16 0.4× 20 0.6× 27 400
Dang Khanh Ngan Ho Taiwan 9 78 0.6× 25 0.5× 56 1.3× 6 0.2× 31 1.0× 18 349
Hannes Kahrass Germany 14 220 1.7× 9 0.2× 128 3.0× 31 0.9× 71 2.2× 24 376
Tania Moerenhout Belgium 8 49 0.4× 28 0.6× 81 1.9× 11 0.3× 16 0.5× 16 189
Marieke Bak Netherlands 10 87 0.7× 11 0.2× 50 1.2× 8 0.2× 18 0.6× 40 277
Brandy Mapes United States 4 90 0.7× 56 1.2× 70 1.6× 15 0.4× 14 0.4× 7 240
Xinchan Jiang Hong Kong 11 57 0.4× 34 0.7× 100 2.3× 13 0.4× 15 0.5× 16 347

Countries citing papers authored by M.C. Ploem

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.C. Ploem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.C. Ploem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.C. Ploem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.C. Ploem

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.C. Ploem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.C. Ploem. The network helps show where M.C. Ploem may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M.C. Ploem

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M.C. Ploem. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M.C. Ploem based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M.C. Ploem. M.C. Ploem is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Siemelink, Marten A., Randy Klaassen, M.C. Ploem, et al.. (2025). DNA-poli: Design and development of a digital platform for family communication support and predictive genetic counseling on inherited diseases. Patient Education and Counseling. 136. 108746–108746.
2.
Ploem, M.C., C.L. Mulder, Ans M. M. van Pelt, et al.. (2025). Stem cell-derived gametes: what to expect when expecting their clinical introduction. Human Reproduction. 40(9). 1605–1615. 2 indexed citations
3.
Bak, Marieke, et al.. (2025). From European Standards to Responsible Use of AI in Clinical Practice. European Journal of Health Law. 32(2). 111–138. 2 indexed citations
4.
Habibović, Mirela, Dick L. Willems, Willem J. Kop, et al.. (2024). Ethics of Wearable-Based Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Detection. Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 17(9). e012913–e012913. 5 indexed citations
5.
Metselaar, Suzanne, et al.. (2024). Promising for patients or deeply disturbing? The ethical and legal aspects of deepfake therapy. Journal of Medical Ethics. 51(7). 481–486. 4 indexed citations
6.
Bak, Marieke, Marieke T. Blom, Domagoj Damjanović, et al.. (2023). Data-driven sudden cardiac arrest research in Europe: Experts’ perspectives on ethical challenges and governance strategies. Resuscitation Plus. 15. 100414–100414. 2 indexed citations
7.
Bak, Marieke, M.C. Ploem, Hanno L. Tan, Marieke T. Blom, & Dick L. Willems. (2023). Towards trust-based governance of health data research. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy. 26(2). 185–200. 16 indexed citations
9.
Bak, Marieke, et al.. (2020). Bij een intelligente lockdown past een intelligente app. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 19. 38–39. 1 indexed citations
10.
Ploem, M.C. & Jeanine Suurmond. (2020). Registering ethnicity for covid-19 research: is the law an obstacle?. BMJ. 370. m3367–m3367. 4 indexed citations
11.
Bak, Marieke, Marieke T. Blom, Rudolph W. Koster, & M.C. Ploem. (2020). Resuscitation with an AED: putting the data to use. Netherlands Heart Journal. 29(4). 179–185. 2 indexed citations
12.
Scott, Anna Mae, et al.. (2020). Exempting low-risk health and medical research from ethics reviews: comparing Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States and the Netherlands. Health Research Policy and Systems. 18(1). 11–11. 37 indexed citations
13.
Cornel, Martina C., M.C. Ploem, & J. K. M. Gevers. (2019). Commercieel aanbod van DNA-tests : Ruim baan voor vrije markt en zelfbeschikking?. Pure Amsterdam UMC. 32. 2364–2371. 1 indexed citations
14.
Bak, Marieke, et al.. (2019). Stakeholders’ perspectives on the post-mortem use of genetic and health-related data for research: a systematic review. European Journal of Human Genetics. 28(4). 403–416. 18 indexed citations
15.
Ploem, M.C.. (2018). Legal challenges for the implementation of advanced clinical digital decision support systems in Europe. Journal of Clinical and Translational Research. 3(Suppl 3). 424–430. 17 indexed citations
16.
Opmeer, Brent C., et al.. (2017). Van statusvoering naar wetenschappelijk onderzoek. Nederlandsch tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/NTvG-databank. 161. 1 indexed citations
17.
Ploem, M.C.. (2017). The right not to know: scope and limits. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 36(2). 81–90. 1 indexed citations
18.
Gevers, J. K. M. & M.C. Ploem. (2012). Wettelijke vormgeving van de regiefunctie betreffende kwaliteit van zorg; zijn we op de goede weg?. Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidsrecht. 36(8). 648–658. 1 indexed citations
19.
Ploem, M.C., et al.. (2011). News and Views Introduction of a National Electronic Patient Record in The Netherlands: Some Legal Issues. European Journal of Health Law. 18(2). 191–204. 3 indexed citations
20.
Ploem, M.C.. (2001). Vertrouwelijkheid van medische gegevens. Continuïteit en ontwikkeling. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 35–44.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026