Max Schütz

1.2k citations
31 papers · 1.0k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Max Schütz

30 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Max Schütz
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 660
  • Biophysics 153
  • Biomedical Engineering 436
  • Analytical Chemistry 97
  • Materials Chemistry 380
Replace Lothar Opilik with:
Lothar Opilik Switzerland
Marta N. Sanz‐Ortiz Spain
Ya‐Chuan Kao Singapore
Vanesa López‐Puente Spain
Frank Theil Germany
Jan Krajczewski Poland
Sergio Rodal‐Cedeira Spain
Shuo‐Hui Cao China
Sultan Ben‐Jaber United Kingdom
Arumugam Sivanesan Australia
Max Schütz relative to Lothar Opilik Switzerland Lothar Opilik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Lothar Opilik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max Schütz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max Schütz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Schütz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Schütz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max Schütz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Schütz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Schütz. The network helps show where Max Schütz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Max Schütz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max Schütz Line = papers co-authored together Max Schütz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009184
2 2011135
3 199677
4 201171
5 201163
6 201154
7 201343
8 201340
9 201037
10 202137
11 201536
12 201136
13 201229
14 201128
15 201924
16 202123
17 201621
18 202120
19 200912
20 201411

About Max Schütz

Max Schütz is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Inorganic Chemistry and Organic Chemistry, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (16 papers), Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications (13 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (6 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (5 papers), Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (4 papers), Inorganic Chemistry and Materials (4 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (3 papers) and Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (660 citations), Biophysics (153 citations), Biomedical Engineering (436 citations), Analytical Chemistry (97 citations) and Materials Chemistry (380 citations). Max Schütz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Sebastian Schlücker, Mohammad Salehi, Mohammad Salehi, Karsten Kömpe, Magdalena Gellner, Carsten Schmuck, Bernd Küstner, Alexander Marx, Philipp Ströbel and Friedrich Schöppler. Their work appears in journals such as Small, Inorganic Chemistry, Dalton Transactions, Chemical Communications and Journal of Raman Spectroscopy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact