Max Rinkel

19 papers receiving 216 citations

Peers

Max Rinkel
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Clinical Psychology 168
  • General Psychology 7
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 51
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 67
  • Philosophy 33
Replace R. A. Sandison with:
R. A. Sandison United Kingdom
D. V. Siva Sankar United States
Paul H. Hoch United States
W. Mayer-Groß United Kingdom
Howard D. Fabing United States
Amedeo S. Marrazzi United States
Hudson Hoagland United States
Stephen Szára United States
Julian J. Lasky United States
Jack Shelton United States
Max Rinkel relative to R. A. Sandison United Kingdom R. A. Sandison's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
R. A. Sandison · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max Rinkel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max Rinkel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Rinkel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Rinkel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max Rinkel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Rinkel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Rinkel. The network helps show where Max Rinkel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Max Rinkel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max Rinkel Line = papers co-authored together Max Rinkel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195289
2 195265
3 195538
4
Experimental psychiatry. III. A chemical concept of psychosis.
195419
5 196617
6 196016
7 196313
8 195711
9 195711
10 196010
11 19577
12 19587
13
Experimental psychiatry. IV. Hallucinogens: tools in experimental psychiatry.
19555
14 19664
15 19513
16 19662
17 19562
18
Chemical theories of psychosis.
20001
19
CLINICAL AND PHYSIO-CHEMICAL OBSERVATIONS IN EXPERIMENTAL PsYcHosIs
19551
20 20080

About Max Rinkel

Max Rinkel is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Organic Chemistry, Social Psychology and Surgery, having authored 21 papers that have together received 321 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychedelics and Drug Studies (6 papers), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (2 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (1 paper), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Medical and Biological Sciences (1 paper), Epilepsy research and treatment (1 paper), Coordination Chemistry and Organometallics (1 paper) and Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (168 citations), General Psychology (7 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (51 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (67 citations) and Philosophy (33 citations). Max Rinkel has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Harry C. Solomon, Robert W. Hyde, Hudson Hoagland, Harold E. Himwich, Herman C.B. Denber, Jonathan Brown, Jonathan Brown, Alberto DiMascio, Milton Greenblatt and William L. Holt. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, Psychiatric Quarterly and New England Journal of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact