Max Petersen
Impact in
- Catalysis top 10%
- Catalysts for Methane Reforming
- Materials Chemistry top 5%
- Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
- Hydrogen Storage and Materials
- Graphene research and applications
Papers in
-
- Advanced Chemical Physics Studies 2
-
- Copper Interconnects and Reliability 1
- Co-authors
- Niranjan Govind (1 shared paper)Dominic King‐Smith (1 shared paper)George B. FitzGerald (1 shared paper)Jan Andzelm (1 shared paper)Matthias Scheffler (1 shared paper)Frank Richard Wagner (1 shared paper)Peter Blaha (1 shared paper)Lars Hufnagel (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Applied Physics Letters (2 papers)Computational Materials Science (2 papers)Computer Physics Communications (1 paper)Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
Max Petersen
5 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Max Petersen's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Catalysis 65
- Materials Chemistry 405
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 119
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 300
- Metals and Alloys 9
Countries citing papers authored by Max Petersen
This map shows the geographic impact of Max Petersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Petersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Petersen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Max Petersen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Petersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Petersen. The network helps show where Max Petersen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Max Petersen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A generalized synchronous transit method for transition state location Hit paper breakdown → | 2003 | 1180 |
| 2 | 2000 | 365 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 43 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 0 |
About Max Petersen
Max Petersen is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nuclear Energy and Engineering and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 6 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (2 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (2 papers) and Copper Interconnects and Reliability (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (65 citations), Materials Chemistry (405 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (119 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (300 citations) and Metals and Alloys (9 citations). Max Petersen has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Israel and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Niranjan Govind, Dominic King‐Smith, George B. FitzGerald, Jan Andzelm, Matthias Scheffler, Frank Richard Wagner, Peter Blaha, Lars Hufnagel, Karlheinz Schwarz and Yakov Roizin. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Computational Materials Science, Computer Physics Communications and Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.