Max Nathan

2.2k total citations
49 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Max Nathan is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Urban Studies and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Max Nathan has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 17 papers in Urban Studies and 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Max Nathan's work include Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (18 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (16 papers) and Regional Development and Policy (11 papers). Max Nathan is often cited by papers focused on Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (18 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (16 papers) and Regional Development and Policy (11 papers). Max Nathan collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Azerbaijan and Italy. Max Nathan's co-authors include Henry G. Overman, Neil Lee, Riccardo Crescenzi, Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose, Paul C. Cheshire, Sevrin Waights, Thomas Kemeny, Dave O’Brien, Andy C. Pratt and Chris Webber and has published in prestigious journals such as Research Policy, Urban Studies and Environment and Planning A Economy and Space.

In The Last Decade

Max Nathan

47 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Max Nathan United Kingdom	19	585	377	269	250	223	49	1.3k
Nichola Lowe United States	18	441 0.8×	307 0.8×	332 1.2×	182 0.7×	220 1.0×	57	1.1k
Thomas Wainwright United Kingdom	15	420 0.7×	262 0.7×	299 1.1×	166 0.7×	210 0.9×	35	1.3k
F.W.M. Boekema Netherlands	17	442 0.8×	254 0.7×	258 1.0×	375 1.5×	133 0.6×	49	1.1k
AnnaLee Saxenian Taiwan	5	641 1.1×	387 1.0×	394 1.5×	582 2.3×	178 0.8×	9	1.5k
Roel Rutten Netherlands	20	408 0.7×	316 0.8×	244 0.9×	284 1.1×	115 0.5×	42	1.0k
M S Gertler Canada	9	747 1.3×	308 0.8×	379 1.4×	728 2.9×	320 1.4×	13	1.8k
Dirk Dohse Germany	13	585 1.0×	193 0.5×	566 2.1×	234 0.9×	67 0.3×	40	1.2k
Maria Abreu United Kingdom	17	764 1.3×	214 0.6×	574 2.1×	330 1.3×	75 0.3×	54	1.6k
Philip R. Tomlinson United Kingdom	20	572 1.0×	173 0.5×	262 1.0×	567 2.3×	106 0.5×	72	1.4k
Yasuyuki Motoyama United States	16	341 0.6×	259 0.7×	529 2.0×	238 1.0×	66 0.3×	51	1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Max Nathan

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max Nathan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Nathan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Nathan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max Nathan

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Nathan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Nathan. The network helps show where Max Nathan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Max Nathan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Max Nathan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Max Nathan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Max Nathan. Max Nathan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Draca, Mirko, et al.. (2024). The New Wave? The Role of Human Capital and Stem Skills in Technology Adoption in the UK. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Tranos, Emmanouil, et al.. (2022). Modeling clusters from the ground up: A web data approach. Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science. 50(1). 244–267. 8 indexed citations

Kitsos, Tasos, et al.. (2021). Creative Clusters and Creative Multipliers: Evidence from UK Cities. SocArXiv (OSF Preprints). 4 indexed citations

Nathan, Max, et al.. (2021). Incubators, accelerators and urban economic development. Urban Studies. 59(2). 281–300. 39 indexed citations

Nathan, Max. (2021). Critical Commentary: The city and the virus. Urban Studies. 60(8). 1346–1364. 22 indexed citations

Nathan, Max. (2019). Does Light Touch Cluster Policy Work? Evaluating the Tech City Programme. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 1 indexed citations

Nathan, Max, et al.. (2018). Spatial Imaginaries and Tech Cities: Place-branding East London’s digital economy. Journal of Economic Geography. 19(2). 409–432. 42 indexed citations

Nathan, Max. (2016). Ethnic diversity and business performance: Which firms? Which cities?. Environment and Planning A Economy and Space. 48(12). 2462–2483. 23 indexed citations

Nathan, Max, et al.. (2015). Creative Economy Employment in the EU and UK: A comparative analysis. 6 indexed citations

10.

Crescenzi, Riccardo, Max Nathan, & Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose. (2015). Do inventors talk to strangers? On proximity and collaborative knowledge creation. Research Policy. 45(1). 177–194. 182 indexed citations

11.

Cheshire, Paul C., Max Nathan, & Henry G. Overman. (2014). Urban Economics and Urban Policy. Books. 2 indexed citations

12.

Nathan, Max, et al.. (2014). Here Be Startups: Exploring London's 'Tech City' Digital Cluster. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 1 indexed citations

13.

Nathan, Max. (2014). Top Team Diversity and Business Performance: Latent Class Analysis for Firms and Cities. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

14.

Crescenzi, Riccardo, Max Nathan, & Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose. (2013). Do Inventors Talk to Strangers? On Proximity and Collaborative Knowledge Creation. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).

15.

Nathan, Max & Neil Lee. (2013). Cultural Diversity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship: Firm-Level Evidence from London. SSRN Electronic Journal. 15 indexed citations

16.

Lee, Neil & Max Nathan. (2013). Cultural diversity, innovation and entrepreneurship: firm-level evidence from London. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 2 indexed citations

17.

Crescenzi, Riccardo, Max Nathan, & Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose. (2013). Do Inventors Talk to Strangers? On Proximity and Collaborative Knowledge Creation. SSRN Electronic Journal. 7 indexed citations

18.

Nathan, Max. (2012). After Florida: Towards an economics of diversity. European Urban and Regional Studies. 22(1). 3–19. 40 indexed citations

19.

Lee, Neil & Max Nathan. (2010). Knowledge workers, cultural diversity and innovation: evidence from London. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development. 1(1/2). 53–53. 35 indexed citations

20.

Nathan, Max. (2007). The Wrong Stuff? Creative Class Theory and Economic Performance in UK cities/Ce Qui Ne Marche Pas? la Theorie De la Classe Creative et la Performance Economique Dans Les Villes Au R.-U. Canadian Journal of Regional Science. 30(3). 433. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact