Max Nathan

47 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Max Nathan
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 269
  • Urban Studies 223
  • Economics and Econometrics 585
  • Strategy and Management 250
  • Business and International Management 26
Replace Nichola Lowe with:
Nichola Lowe United States
F.W.M. Boekema Netherlands
Roel Rutten Netherlands
Camilla Lenzi Italy
Maria Abreu United Kingdom
M S Gertler Canada
AnnaLee Saxenian Taiwan
Jarle Aarstad Norway
Mia Gray United Kingdom
Seamus Grimes Ireland
Max Nathan relative to Nichola Lowe United States Nichola Lowe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Nichola Lowe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max Nathan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max Nathan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Nathan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Nathan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max Nathan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Nathan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Nathan. The network helps show where Max Nathan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Max Nathan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max Nathan Line = papers co-authored together Max Nathan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015182
2 2013173
3 201477
4 201370
5 201468
6 201466
7 202064
8 201842
9 201240
10 202139
11 201538
12 201035
13 201431
14 201431
15 202130
16 201926
17 201623
18 202122
19 202219
20
The Wrong Stuff? Creative Class Theory and Economic Performance in UK cities/Ce Qui Ne Marche Pas? la Theorie De la Classe Creative et la Performance Economique Dans Les Villes Au R.-U
200717

About Max Nathan

Max Nathan is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Management of Technology and Innovation, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations and Modeling and Simulation, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (18 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (16 papers), Regional Development and Policy (11 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (10 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (8 papers), Spatial and Panel Data Analysis (5 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (4 papers) and Migration and Labor Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (269 citations), Urban Studies (223 citations), Economics and Econometrics (585 citations), Strategy and Management (250 citations) and Business and International Management (26 citations). Max Nathan has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Azerbaijan and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Henry G. Overman, Neil Lee, Riccardo Crescenzi, Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose, Paul C. Cheshire, Sevrin Waights, Thomas Kemeny, Dave O’Brien, Andy C. Pratt and Chris Webber. Their work appears in journals such as Research Policy, Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science, Economic Geography, Environment and Planning A Economy and Space and Urban Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026