Max Nänny

555 total citations
15 papers, 38 citations indexed

About

Max Nänny is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Max Nänny has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 38 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 4 papers in History and 1 paper in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Max Nänny's work include American and British Literature Analysis (6 papers), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (3 papers) and American Literature and Culture (3 papers). Max Nänny is often cited by papers focused on American and British Literature Analysis (6 papers), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (3 papers) and American Literature and Culture (3 papers). Max Nänny collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland. Max Nänny's co-authors include Olga Fischer and has published in prestigious journals such as English Studies, ELH and European Journal of English Studies.

In The Last Decade

Max Nänny

6 papers receiving 24 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Max Nänny Switzerland	5	14	13	12	6	5	15	38
George Lyman Kittredge	3	13 0.9×	11 0.8×	19 1.6×	8 1.3×	4 0.8×	12	68
Jörg Schönert Finland	4	19 1.4×	9 0.7×	14 1.2×	10 1.7×	2 0.4×	27	56
Edwin A. Abbott United States	6	11 0.8×	7 0.5×	15 1.3×	4 0.7×	8 1.6×	24	71
Ernest Francisco Fenollosa United States	4	15 1.1×	5 0.4×	11 0.9×	14 2.3×	3 0.6×	9	45
August Wilhelm von Schlegel	4	17 1.2×	4 0.3×	15 1.3×	7 1.2×	3 0.6×	19	59
Michel Bréal Brazil	4	8 0.6×	18 1.4×	33 2.8×	3 0.5×	11 2.2×	7	62
Christopher Routledge United Kingdom	4	20 1.4×	14 1.1×	15 1.3×	4 0.7×	2 0.4×	6	44
Michael Scheffel Germany	5	15 1.1×	5 0.4×	14 1.2×	9 1.5×	2 0.4×	14	52
Johan de Joode Belgium	3	12 0.9×	13 1.0×	12 1.0×	7 1.2×	7 1.4×	7	35
Jonathan Bellman United States	5	9 0.6×	8 0.6×	4 0.3×	14 2.3×	3 0.6×	17	84

Countries citing papers authored by Max Nänny

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max Nänny's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Nänny with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Nänny more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max Nänny

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Nänny. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Nänny. The network helps show where Max Nänny may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Max Nänny

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Max Nänny. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Max Nänny based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Max Nänny. Max Nänny is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

15 of 15 papers shown

1.

Nänny, Max. (2004). Ernest Hemingways <I>Fiesta</I>. 2004(12). 263–278. 1 indexed citations

2.

Nänny, Max. (2002). Die ikonische Verwendung des Chiasmus in der Literatur. 293–316. 1 indexed citations

3.

Nänny, Max. (2002). Ernest Hemingway. Der Mensch. Der Schriftsteller (review). The Hemingway review. 22(1). 131–134.

4.

Nänny, Max. (2001). The Use of Natural Objects as Symbols in Hemingway's "Up in Michigan". UST Research Online (University of St. Thomas - Minnesota). 68.

5.

Fischer, Olga & Max Nänny. (2001). Introduction: Iconicity and Nature. European Journal of English Studies. 5(1). 3–16. 4 indexed citations

6.

Nänny, Max. (2000). Formal Allusions to Visual Ideas and Visual Art in Hemingway’s Work. European Journal of English Studies. 4(1). 66–82. 1 indexed citations

7.

Fischer, Olga & Max Nänny. (2000). The Motivated Sign. Iconicity in Language and Literature 2. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 16 indexed citations

8.

Nänny, Max. (1998). Hemingway’s Use of Chiastic Centering as an Interpretative Clue. UST Research Online (University of St. Thomas - Minnesota). 65(3).

9.

Nänny, Max. (1997). Hemingway’s Architecture of Prose: Chiastic Patterns and Their Narrative Functions. UST Research Online (University of St. Thomas - Minnesota). 64(3). 4 indexed citations

10.

Nänny, Max. (1988). Chiasmus in literature: Ornament or function?. Word & Image. 4(1). 51–59. 5 indexed citations

11.

Nänny, Max. (1986). Iconicity in literature. Word & Image. 2(3). 199–208. 4 indexed citations

12.

Nänny, Max. (1985). The waste land:a menippean satire?∗. English Studies. 66(6). 526–535. 1 indexed citations

13.

Nänny, Max. (1981). ‘Cards are queer’: A new reading of the tarot inThe Waste Land.. English Studies. 62(4). 335–347. 1 indexed citations

14.

Nänny, Max. (1980). Context, Contiguity and Contact in Ezra Pound's Personae. ELH. 47(2). 386–386.

15.

Nänny, Max. (1962). Ezra Pound's visual poetry and the method of science. English Studies. 43(1-6). 426–430.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact