Maud Charpentier

900 total citations
19 papers, 635 citations indexed

About

Maud Charpentier is a scholar working on Immunology, Oncology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Maud Charpentier has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 635 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Immunology, 8 papers in Oncology and 7 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Maud Charpentier's work include Immune Cell Function and Interaction (6 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (6 papers) and Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (6 papers). Maud Charpentier is often cited by papers focused on Immune Cell Function and Interaction (6 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (6 papers) and Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (6 papers). Maud Charpentier collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Spain. Maud Charpentier's co-authors include Sandra Demaria, Silvia C. Formenti, Sheila Spada, Nils-Petter Rudqvist, Xi Kathy Zhou, Tuo Zhang, Claire Lhuillier, Nathalie Labarrière, Lorenzo Galluzzi and Takahiro Yamazaki and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Investigation, Nature Communications and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Maud Charpentier

18 papers receiving 618 citations

Peers

Maud Charpentier
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Molecular Biology 337
  • Oncology 260
  • Immunology 249
  • Cancer Research 89
  • Genetics 68
Remy Thomas Qatar
Yoshihiro Koya Japan
Narendiran Rajasekaran United States
Andrew Gray United States
Scott D. Brown Canada
Dawson Knoblock United States
Ilan Volovitz Israel
Sarah Maenhout Belgium
Il‐Kyu Kim South Korea
J Xiang Canada
Remy Thomas Qatar View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Maud Charpentier
Maud Charpentier · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Maud Charpentier
Maud Charpentier · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Maud Charpentier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maud Charpentier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maud Charpentier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maud Charpentier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maud Charpentier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maud Charpentier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maud Charpentier. The network helps show where Maud Charpentier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maud Charpentier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maud Charpentier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maud Charpentier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maud Charpentier. Maud Charpentier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 1
3 32
4 4
5 72
6 15
7 159
8 1
9 35
10 5
11 0
12 40
13 152
14 44
15 28
16 20
17 9
18
[Renal medullary carcinoma, a new clinico-pathological entity. Immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, flow cytometric and cytogenetic study of a case].
10
19
Inclusions intranucléaires dans une tumeur osseuse à cellules géantes. Mise en évidence au microscope électronique
7

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026