Matthias Wittfoth
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Stefan KoelschThomas C. GunterDaniela SammlerReinhard DenglerManfred HerrmannManfred FahleGilian TenbergenBoris Schiffer
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (8 papers)Neuroscience and Music Perception (7 papers)Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (5 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONENeuroImageBrain Research
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesAustria
In The Last Decade
Matthias Wittfoth
30 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Cognitive Neuroscience 708
- Clinical Psychology 342
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 305
- Social Psychology 263
- Psychiatry and Mental health 125
Countries citing papers authored by Matthias Wittfoth
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthias Wittfoth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthias Wittfoth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthias Wittfoth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthias Wittfoth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthias Wittfoth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthias Wittfoth. The network helps show where Matthias Wittfoth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthias Wittfoth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthias Wittfoth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthias Wittfoth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthias Wittfoth. Matthias Wittfoth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 32 | |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | 83 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 31 | |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | 25 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 28 | |
| 16 | 57 | |
| 17 | 76 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 40 | |
| 20 | 51 |
About Matthias Wittfoth
Matthias Wittfoth is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (8 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (7 papers) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (708 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (305 citations) and Clinical Psychology (342 citations). Matthias Wittfoth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Koelsch, Thomas C. Gunter, Daniela Sammler, Reinhard Dengler, Manfred Herrmann, Manfred Fahle, Gilian Tenbergen, Boris Schiffer, Jorge Ponseti and Henrik Walter. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, NeuroImage and Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.