Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Feynman Lectures on Physics
19641.7k citationsRichard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton et al.Physics Todayprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Sands's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Sands with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Sands more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Sands. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Sands. The network helps show where Matthew Sands may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew Sands
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew Sands.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew Sands based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew Sands. Matthew Sands is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Feynman, Richard P., Robert B. Leighton, & Matthew Sands. (2015). Quantenmechanik.1 indexed citations
3.
Feynman, Richard P., Robert B. Leighton, Matthew Sands, Michael Gottlieb, & Rudolf Pfeiffer. (2014). Lectures on physics : exercises for the Feynman. Basic Books.
4.
Feynman, Richard, et al.. (2013). Le cours de physique de Feynman. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).1 indexed citations
5.
Feynman, Richard P., Robert B. Leighton, & Matthew Sands. (2008). Mainly Electromagnetism and Matter. Medical Entomology and Zoology.38 indexed citations
6.
Feynman, Richard P., Robert B. Leighton, & Matthew Sands. (2007). Vorlesungen über Physik. Oldenbourg eBooks.1 indexed citations
Feynman, Richard P., et al.. (2005). Feynman's Tips on Physics : A Problem-Solving Supplement to the Feynman Lectures on Physics. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).1 indexed citations
Feynman, Richard P., Robert B. Leighton, & Matthew Sands. (1982). Feynmanove prednášky z fyziky 2.
12.
Feynman, Richard P., Robert B. Leighton, & Matthew Sands. (1980). Feynmanove prednášky z fyziky. Zv. 1 : The Feynman lectures onphysics (Orig.).1 indexed citations
13.
Feynman, Richard P., Robert B. Leighton, & Matthew Sands. (1965). Фейнмановские лекции по физике.1 indexed citations
14.
Feynman, Richard P., Robert B. Leighton, Matthew Sands, & S. B. Treiman. (1964). The Feynman Lectures on Physics. Physics Today. 17(8). 45–46.1673 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Feynman, Richard P., Robert B. Leighton, & Matthew Sands. (1964). Feynman Lectures on Physics, Volume 2: Mainly Electromagnetism and Matter.49 indexed citations
16.
Feynman, Richard P., Robert B. Leighton, & Matthew Sands. (1963). Mainly mechanics, radiation, and heat. Addison-Wesley eBooks.27 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.