Matthew Sacher

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Matthew Sacher is a scholar working on Insect Science, Plant Science and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Matthew Sacher has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Insect Science, 5 papers in Plant Science and 2 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Matthew Sacher's work include Insect Pest Control Strategies (5 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (5 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (3 papers). Matthew Sacher is often cited by papers focused on Insect Pest Control Strategies (5 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (5 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (3 papers). Matthew Sacher collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and China. Matthew Sacher's co-authors include Keith D. Wing, Michael E. Schnee, Eric A. Benner, Daniel F. Rhoades, Steven Gutteridge, Lihong Wu, Yong Tao, Daniel Cordova, Lindsey Flexner and James J. Rauh and has published in prestigious journals such as Pest Management Science, Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Crop Protection.

In The Last Decade

Matthew Sacher

7 papers receiving 982 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Anthranilic diamides: A new class of insecticides with a novel mode of action, ryanodine receptor activation

2005 541 citations Daniel Cordova, Eric A. Benner et al. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology profile →

Peers

Matthew Sacher

IS

MB

PS

EEBS

HTM

Jahangir Khajehali Iran

Michael J. Smirle Canada

Susan J. Dorrian Australia

James E. Dripps United States

Kumar Saurabh Singh United Kingdom

Kangetsu Hirase Japan

Zhao Zhimo China

Ruixian Yu China

Mark A. Jackson United States

Tetsuo Saito Japan

Jahangir Khajehali Iran

Matthew Sacher

975 ×1.2

IS

626 ×1.1

MB

498 ×1.1

PS

142 ×1.9

EEBS

22 ×0.3

HTM

Citations per year, relative to Matthew Sacher Matthew Sacher (= 1×) peers Jahangir Khajehali

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Sacher

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Sacher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Sacher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Sacher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Sacher

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Sacher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Sacher. The network helps show where Matthew Sacher may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew Sacher

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew Sacher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew Sacher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew Sacher. Matthew Sacher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Tao, Yong, Steven Gutteridge, Eric A. Benner, et al.. (2013). Identification of a critical region in the Drosophila ryanodine receptor that confers sensitivity to diamide insecticides. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 43(9). 820–828. 46 indexed citations

2.

Freere, Peter, et al.. (2010). A Low Cost Wind Turbine and Blade Performance. Wind Engineering. 34(3). 289–302. 18 indexed citations

3.

Cordova, Daniel, Eric A. Benner, Matthew Sacher, et al.. (2005). Anthranilic diamides: A new class of insecticides with a novel mode of action, ryanodine receptor activation. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 84(3). 196–214. 541 indexed citations breakdown →

4.

Tillman, P. Glynn, et al.. (2001). Toxicity of a formulation of the insecticide indoxacarb to the tarnished plant bug, Lygus lineolaris (Hemiptera: Miridae), and the big‐eyed bug, Geocoris punctipes (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae). Pest Management Science. 58(1). 92–100. 26 indexed citations

5.

Wing, Keith D., et al.. (2000). Bioactivation and mode of action of the oxadiazine indoxacarb in insects. Crop Protection. 19(8-10). 537–545. 233 indexed citations

6.

Wing, Keith D., et al.. (1998). A novel oxadiazine insecticide is bioactivated in lepidopteran larvae. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology. 37(1). 91–103. 157 indexed citations

7.

Wing, Keith D., et al.. (1998). A novel oxadiazine insecticide is bioactivated in lepidopteran larvae. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology. 37(1). 91–103. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact