Matthew R. Naunheim

1.9k total citations
117 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Matthew R. Naunheim is a scholar working on Physiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, Matthew R. Naunheim has authored 117 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 44 papers in Physiology, 40 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 31 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in Matthew R. Naunheim's work include Voice and Speech Disorders (39 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (31 papers) and Dysphagia Assessment and Management (29 papers). Matthew R. Naunheim is often cited by papers focused on Voice and Speech Disorders (39 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (31 papers) and Dysphagia Assessment and Management (29 papers). Matthew R. Naunheim collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Matthew R. Naunheim's co-authors include Thomas L. Carroll, Ramon A. Franco, Phillip C. Song, Stacey T. Gray, Vinay K. Rathi, Mark G. Shrime, Mark A. Varvares, Mark S. Courey, Nate Jowett and Elliana Kirsh DeVore and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Spine and CHEST Journal.

In The Last Decade

Matthew R. Naunheim

110 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Matthew R. Naunheim United States 16 417 367 315 282 138 117 1.1k
Andreas Mueller Germany 19 359 0.9× 363 1.0× 208 0.7× 264 0.9× 184 1.3× 62 971
David D. Pothier United Kingdom 24 139 0.3× 290 0.8× 163 0.5× 528 1.9× 580 4.2× 79 1.7k
Edward J. Damrose United States 20 539 1.3× 561 1.5× 370 1.2× 380 1.3× 90 0.7× 84 1.1k
Neil K. Chadha Canada 24 350 0.8× 481 1.3× 153 0.5× 533 1.9× 390 2.8× 110 1.8k
Randall W. Brown United States 23 872 2.1× 640 1.7× 325 1.0× 106 0.4× 72 0.5× 60 1.7k
Karen Kost Canada 22 363 0.9× 567 1.5× 219 0.7× 394 1.4× 240 1.7× 87 1.3k
Hester J. van der Zaag–Loonen Netherlands 23 101 0.2× 364 1.0× 201 0.6× 416 1.5× 101 0.7× 91 1.9k
Noah P. Parker United States 16 297 0.7× 486 1.3× 129 0.4× 361 1.3× 166 1.2× 48 1.2k
Julie E. Strychowsky Canada 15 170 0.4× 202 0.6× 79 0.3× 428 1.5× 138 1.0× 66 978
Martijn M. Stuiver Netherlands 27 498 1.2× 524 1.4× 175 0.6× 631 2.2× 298 2.2× 129 2.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew R. Naunheim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew R. Naunheim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew R. Naunheim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew R. Naunheim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew R. Naunheim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew R. Naunheim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew R. Naunheim. The network helps show where Matthew R. Naunheim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew R. Naunheim

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew R. Naunheim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew R. Naunheim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew R. Naunheim. Matthew R. Naunheim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Simonyan, Kristina, et al.. (2025). Feasibility of Real‐Time Automated Vocal Fold Motion Tracking for In‐Office Laryngoscopy. The Laryngoscope. 136(2). 596–604.
2.
Lechien, Jérôme R., et al.. (2024). ChatGPT-4 accuracy for patient education in laryngopharyngeal reflux. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 281(5). 2547–2552. 11 indexed citations
3.
Wasserman, Isaac, Divya A. Chari, Stacey T. Gray, Matthew R. Naunheim, & Eli M. Miloslavsky. (2023). Ear, Nose, and Throat Manifestations of Vasculitis and Other Systemic Autoimmune Diseases. Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America. 49(3). 633–645. 1 indexed citations
4.
Naunheim, Matthew R., et al.. (2023). Patient Experiences With Thyroid Nodules: A Qualitative Interview Survey. OTO Open. 7(1). e39–e39. 3 indexed citations
5.
Evangelista, Emily, Anaïs Rameau, Alexander Gelbard, et al.. (2023). Current Practices in Voice Data Collection and Limitations to Voice AI Research: A National Survey. The Laryngoscope. 134(3). 1333–1339. 6 indexed citations
6.
Naunheim, Matthew R., et al.. (2023). Voice Disorders Associated With the Use of Inhaled Corticosteroids. Otolaryngology. 168(5). 1034–1037. 4 indexed citations
7.
Naunheim, Matthew R., et al.. (2023). Do You Like Your Voice? A Population‐Based Survey of Voice Satisfaction and Voice Enhancement. The Laryngoscope. 133(12). 3455–3461. 3 indexed citations
8.
Naunheim, Matthew R., et al.. (2023). Polypoid Corditis. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 98(1). 200–201. 1 indexed citations
9.
Sheth, Amar H., et al.. (2022). Physician Turnover Among Otolaryngologists in the United States, 2014–2021. The Laryngoscope. 133(2). 235–236. 3 indexed citations
10.
Naunheim, Matthew R., Allen S. Zhou, Ramon A. Franco, et al.. (2020). Laryngeal complications of COVID‐19. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology. 5(6). 1117–1124. 68 indexed citations
11.
Courey, Mark S. & Matthew R. Naunheim. (2020). Injection Laryngoplasty for Management of Neurological Vocal Fold Immobility. Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology. 68–84. 7 indexed citations
12.
Rathi, Vinay K., et al.. (2020). State-Sponsored Price Transparency Initiatives for Otolaryngologic Procedures in 2019. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery. 146(4). 378–378. 5 indexed citations
13.
DeVore, Elliana Kirsh, Mark G. Shrime, Eve Wittenberg, et al.. (2019). The health utility of mild and severe dysphonia. The Laryngoscope. 130(5). 1256–1262. 12 indexed citations
14.
Feng, Allen L., et al.. (2019). Force Metrics and Suspension Times for Microlaryngoscopy Procedures. Journal of Voice. 35(3). 450–454. 3 indexed citations
15.
Naunheim, Matthew R., Matthew R. Naunheim, Vinay K. Rathi, et al.. (2017). What Do Patients Want from Otolaryngologists? A Discrete Choice Experiment. Otolaryngology. 157(4). 618–624. 12 indexed citations
16.
Naunheim, Matthew R., Matthew R. Naunheim, Vinay K. Rathi, et al.. (2017). Patient Preferences in Subglottic Stenosis Treatment: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Otolaryngology. 158(3). 520–526. 18 indexed citations
17.
Naunheim, Matthew R., Phillip C. Song, Ramon A. Franco, Blake C. Alkire, & Mark G. Shrime. (2016). Surgical management of bilateral vocal fold paralysis: A cost‐effectiveness comparison of two treatments. The Laryngoscope. 127(3). 691–697. 24 indexed citations
18.
Naunheim, Matthew R., Scott R. Plotkin, Ramon A. Franco, & Phillip C. Song. (2016). Laryngeal Manifestations of Neurofibromatosis. Otolaryngology. 154(3). 494–497. 10 indexed citations
19.
Naunheim, Matthew R., et al.. (2015). Cost‐Benefit Analysis of an Otolaryngology Emergency Room Using a Contingent Valuation Approach. Otolaryngology. 153(4). 575–581. 6 indexed citations
20.
Naunheim, Matthew R., Brian P. Walcott, Brian V. Nahed, et al.. (2011). The Quality of Randomized Controlled Trial Reporting in Spine Literature. Spine. 36(16). 1326–1330. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026