Matthew Pitt
Impact in
Papers in
- Neurology 32
- Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma 18
- Co-authors
- Caroline A. Sewry (9 shared papers)Heinz Jungbluth (9 shared papers)Stewart Boyd (4 shared papers)Joe F. Jabre (4 shared papers)S. Robb (7 shared papers)David H. Jones (2 shared papers)Nicholas Kane (2 shared papers)David Beeson (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Neuromuscular Disorders (16 papers)Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (10 papers)Clinical Neurophysiology (7 papers)Muscle & Nerve (6 papers)European Journal of Paediatric Neurology (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Matthew Pitt
73 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Neurology 596
- Genetics 292
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 297
- Psychiatry and Mental health 185
- Cell Biology 197
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Pitt
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Pitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Pitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Pitt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Pitt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Pitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Pitt. The network helps show where Matthew Pitt may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Pitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 131 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 90 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 80 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 76 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 76 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 66 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 63 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 53 | |
| 9 | 1993 | 48 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 44 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 43 | |
| 12 | 1993 | 41 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 41 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 40 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 36 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 36 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 36 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 31 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 30 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 30 |
About Matthew Pitt
Matthew Pitt is a scholar working on Neurology, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Surgery and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (20 papers), Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma (18 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (10 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (7 papers), Hereditary Neurological Disorders (6 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (6 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (5 papers) and Peripheral Nerve Disorders (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (596 citations), Genetics (292 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (297 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (185 citations) and Cell Biology (197 citations). Matthew Pitt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Caroline A. Sewry, Heinz Jungbluth, Stewart Boyd, Joe F. Jabre, S. Robb, David H. Jones, Nicholas Kane, David Beeson, Donald B. Sanders and Erik Stålberg. Their work appears in journals such as Neuromuscular Disorders, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, Clinical Neurophysiology, Muscle & Nerve and European Journal of Paediatric Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.