Matthew P. Hunt
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 2%
- Instrumentation top 2%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Co-authors
- Kurt L. AdelbergerAlice E. ShapleyCharles C. SteidelMax PettiniDawn K. ErbNaveen A. ReddySamantha A. RixA. F. M. Moorwood
- Topics
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (8 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (7 papers)Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (5 papers)
- Journals
- The Astrophysical JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyAstrophysics and Space Science
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Matthew P. Hunt
10 papers receiving 976 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 19
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 991
- Instrumentation 422
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 155
- Global and Planetary Change 40
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 36
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew P. Hunt
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew P. Hunt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew P. Hunt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew P. Hunt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew P. Hunt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew P. Hunt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew P. Hunt. The network helps show where Matthew P. Hunt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew P. Hunt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew P. Hunt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew P. Hunt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew P. Hunt. Matthew P. Hunt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 48 | |
| 4 | 293 | |
| 5 | 53 | |
| 6 | 111 | |
| 7 | 118 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 251 | |
| 10 | 87 |
About Matthew P. Hunt
Matthew P. Hunt is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 995 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (8 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (7 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (422 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (991 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (155 citations). Matthew P. Hunt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Kurt L. Adelberger, Alice E. Shapley, Charles C. Steidel, Max Pettini, Dawn K. Erb, Naveen A. Reddy, Samantha A. Rix, A. F. M. Moorwood, Mauro Giavalisco and Mark Dickinson. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Astrophysics and Space Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.