Matthew P. Dumont
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Psychology
- Philosophy top 10%
- Co-authors
- C. Knight AldrichMarc OstermeierDora M. DumontGurkan GuntasJennifer TullmanSteven Grahame MoretonLaetitia PichevinXavier Crosta
- Topics
- Homelessness and Social Issues (3 papers)Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (2 papers)Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Matthew P. Dumont
32 papers receiving 319 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- General Health Professions 141
- Clinical Psychology 122
- Sociology and Political Science 87
- Social Psychology 40
- Philosophy 39
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew P. Dumont
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew P. Dumont's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew P. Dumont with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew P. Dumont more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew P. Dumont
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew P. Dumont. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew P. Dumont. The network helps show where Matthew P. Dumont may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew P. Dumont
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew P. Dumont. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew P. Dumont based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew P. Dumont. Matthew P. Dumont is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 32 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 73 | |
| 16 | 33 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Mainlining America: Why the Young Use Drugs. | 2 |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About Matthew P. Dumont
Matthew P. Dumont is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science and General Health Professions, having authored 33 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Homelessness and Social Issues (3 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (2 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (122 citations), General Health Professions (141 citations) and Philosophy (39 citations). Matthew P. Dumont has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include C. Knight Aldrich, Marc Ostermeier, Dora M. Dumont, Gurkan Guntas, Jennifer Tullman, Steven Grahame Moreton, Laetitia Pichevin, Xavier Crosta, Walter Geibert and Raja S. Ganeshram. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, American Journal of Psychiatry and American Journal of Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.