Matthew Ingram
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Finance top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Dominic MontaguMay SudhinarasetImke HarbersScott DesposatoBinyang SongKeith BurghardtJunming HuangDiana Kapiszewski
- Topics
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies (12 papers)Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (10 papers)Legal and Constitutional Studies (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsBrazil
In The Last Decade
Matthew Ingram
26 papers receiving 424 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 151
- Economics and Econometrics 110
- Sociology and Political Science 102
- Finance 87
- General Health Professions 76
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Ingram
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Ingram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Ingram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Ingram more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Ingram
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Ingram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Ingram. The network helps show where Matthew Ingram may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew Ingram
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew Ingram. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew Ingram based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew Ingram. Matthew Ingram is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | Testing Modeling Assumptions in the West Africa Ebola Outbreak | 11 |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | Federal Mandates, Spatial Proximity, and Network Affinity: Explaining the Subnational Diffusion of Criminal Procedure Reform in Mexico | 1 |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 240 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Judicial Politics in the Mexican States: Theoretical and Methodological Foundations | 1 |
About Matthew Ingram
Matthew Ingram is a scholar working on Law, Economics and Econometrics and Statistics and Probability, having authored 32 papers that have together received 454 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Judicial and Constitutional Studies (12 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (10 papers) and Legal and Constitutional Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (41 citations), Finance (87 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (151 citations). Matthew Ingram has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Dominic Montagu, May Sudhinaraset, Imke Harbers, Scott Desposato, Binyang Song, Keith Burghardt, Junming Huang, Diana Kapiszewski, William L. Megginson and Ginka Borisova. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, World Development and Journal of Banking & Finance.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.