Matthew H. Wolf

819 total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 686 citations indexed

About

Matthew H. Wolf is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Family Practice. According to data from OpenAlex, Matthew H. Wolf has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 686 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in General Health Professions, 1 paper in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 1 paper in Family Practice. Recurrent topics in Matthew H. Wolf's work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (3 papers) and Child and Adolescent Health (1 paper). Matthew H. Wolf is often cited by papers focused on Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (3 papers) and Child and Adolescent Health (1 paper). Matthew H. Wolf collaborates with scholars based in United States. Matthew H. Wolf's co-authors include Samuel M. Putnam, Sherman A. James, William B. Stiles, Robert H. Pantell and Catherine Lewis and has published in prestigious journals such as Medical Care, Journal of Pediatric Psychology and Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Matthew H. Wolf

6 papers receiving 604 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The medical interview satisfaction scale: Development of a scale to measure patient perceptions of physician behavior

1978 331 citations Matthew H. Wolf, Samuel M. Putnam et al. Journal of Behavioral Medicine profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Matthew H. Wolf United States	6	500	99	97	94	90	6	686
Carol M. Ehrlich United States	5	476 1.0×	143 1.4×	56 0.6×	123 1.3×	112 1.2×	7	696
John Horder United Kingdom	15	378 0.8×	153 1.5×	53 0.5×	99 1.1×	106 1.2×	60	757
Lucy H. Miller United States	4	460 0.9×	129 1.3×	51 0.5×	118 1.3×	106 1.2×	6	674
JA Hall United Kingdom	4	365 0.7×	85 0.9×	45 0.5×	114 1.2×	75 0.8×	9	537
Dina Pilpel Israel	10	421 0.8×	215 2.2×	38 0.4×	58 0.6×	34 0.4×	15	713
Catherine Feste United States	5	498 1.0×	80 0.8×	24 0.2×	55 0.6×	39 0.4×	5	1.1k
George W. Saba United States	14	404 0.8×	218 2.2×	55 0.6×	84 0.9×	119 1.3×	39	715
M. Kim Marvel United States	9	623 1.2×	291 2.9×	81 0.8×	250 2.7×	81 0.9×	15	896
Archie S. Golden United States	8	325 0.7×	220 2.2×	46 0.5×	80 0.9×	33 0.4×	17	637
C. Randall Clinch United States	12	268 0.5×	203 2.1×	93 1.0×	65 0.7×	72 0.8×	21	644

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew H. Wolf

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew H. Wolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew H. Wolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew H. Wolf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew H. Wolf

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew H. Wolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew H. Wolf. The network helps show where Matthew H. Wolf may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew H. Wolf

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew H. Wolf. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew H. Wolf based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew H. Wolf. Matthew H. Wolf is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Wolf, Matthew H., et al.. (1988). Children's Perceptions of Physicians and Medical Care: Two Measures. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 13(2). 247–254. 30 indexed citations

2.

Lewis, Catherine, et al.. (1986). Parent Satisfaction With Children??s Medical Care. Medical Care. 24(3). 209–215. 76 indexed citations

3.

Stiles, William B., Samuel M. Putnam, Sherman A. James, & Matthew H. Wolf. (1979). Dimensions of patient and physician roles in medical screening interviews. Social Science & Medicine Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology. 13(3). 335–341. 13 indexed citations

4.

Stiles, William B., Samuel M. Putnam, Matthew H. Wolf, & Sherman A. James. (1979). Interaction Exchange Structure and Patient Satisfaction with Medical Interviews. Medical Care. 17(6). 667–681. 183 indexed citations

5.

Stiles, William B., Samuel M. Putnam, Sherman A. James, & Matthew H. Wolf. (1979). Dimensions of patient and physician roles in medical screening interviews. Social Science & Medicine Part A Medical Sociology. 13(3). 335–341. 53 indexed citations

6.

Wolf, Matthew H., Samuel M. Putnam, Sherman A. James, & William B. Stiles. (1978). The medical interview satisfaction scale: Development of a scale to measure patient perceptions of physician behavior. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1(4). 391–401. 331 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact