Matthew Guille

1.8k total citations
66 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Matthew Guille is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Matthew Guille has authored 66 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 48 papers in Molecular Biology, 17 papers in Genetics and 8 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Matthew Guille's work include CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (10 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (8 papers) and Congenital heart defects research (7 papers). Matthew Guille is often cited by papers focused on CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (10 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (8 papers) and Congenital heart defects research (7 papers). Matthew Guille collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Matthew Guille's co-authors include Roger Patient, Anna Noble, Ian M. Kerr, Jeffrey M. Rosen, Trevor Dale, George R. Stark, Marko E. Horb, Esther J. Pearl, John Pizzey and David Bertwistle and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nucleic Acids Research and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Matthew Guille

66 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Matthew Guille United Kingdom 22 827 225 200 183 179 66 1.3k
Chiao-Chain Huang United States 10 1.3k 1.6× 141 0.6× 200 1.0× 84 0.5× 328 1.8× 15 1.7k
Takayuki Suzuki Japan 21 2.3k 2.8× 400 1.8× 103 0.5× 95 0.5× 425 2.4× 97 3.0k
Akihiko Moriyama Japan 22 648 0.8× 198 0.9× 143 0.7× 37 0.2× 125 0.7× 81 1.2k
Hirofumi Doi Japan 23 1.5k 1.8× 107 0.5× 99 0.5× 112 0.6× 571 3.2× 61 2.1k
Jorge Guerra‐Varela Spain 16 222 0.3× 100 0.4× 123 0.6× 82 0.4× 80 0.4× 25 675
A. V. Belyavsky Russia 21 1.3k 1.6× 123 0.5× 137 0.7× 25 0.1× 212 1.2× 87 1.7k
Andrew M. Spence Canada 18 1.2k 1.4× 49 0.2× 203 1.0× 64 0.3× 388 2.2× 27 1.9k
Joaquín de Navascués Spain 18 1.5k 1.9× 206 0.9× 150 0.8× 24 0.1× 166 0.9× 27 2.0k
Elizabeth Adam United Kingdom 18 405 0.5× 97 0.4× 217 1.1× 37 0.2× 116 0.6× 48 978
Vladislav M. Panin United States 16 2.1k 2.5× 67 0.3× 506 2.5× 228 1.2× 246 1.4× 32 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Guille

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Guille's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Guille with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Guille more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Guille

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Guille. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Guille. The network helps show where Matthew Guille may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew Guille

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew Guille. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew Guille based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew Guille. Matthew Guille is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ellard, Sian, Karen Stals, Emma L. Baple, et al.. (2022). Identification and functional evaluation of GRIA1 missense and truncation variants in individuals with ID: An emerging neurodevelopmental syndrome. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 109(7). 1217–1241. 22 indexed citations
2.
Guille, Matthew & Robert M. Grainger. (2022). Genetics and Gene Editing Methods inXenopus laevisandXenopus tropicalis. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. 2023(6). pdb.top107045–pdb.top107045. 2 indexed citations
3.
Abu‐Daya, Anita, et al.. (2021). An efficient miRNA knockout approach using CRISPR-Cas9 in Xenopus. Developmental Biology. 483. 66–75. 7 indexed citations
4.
Noble, Anna, Anita Abu‐Daya, & Matthew Guille. (2021). Cryopreservation of Xenopus Sperm and In Vitro Fertilization Using Frozen Sperm Samples. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. 2022(2). pdb.prot107029–pdb.prot107029. 3 indexed citations
5.
Guille, Matthew, et al.. (2020). Raising Antibodies for Use in Xenopus. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. 2020(9). pdb.prot105585–pdb.prot105585. 4 indexed citations
6.
Guille, Matthew, et al.. (2020). Confirming Antibody Specificity in Xenopus. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. 2020(12). pdb.prot105601–pdb.prot105601. 1 indexed citations
7.
Pearl, Esther J., et al.. (2017). An optimized method for cryogenic storage of Xenopus sperm to maximise the effectiveness of research using genetically altered frogs. Theriogenology. 92. 149–155. 27 indexed citations
8.
Guille, Matthew, et al.. (2016). RNA Whole-Mount In situ Hybridisation Proximity Ligation Assay (rISH-PLA), an Assay for Detecting RNA-Protein Complexes in Intact Cells. PLoS ONE. 11(1). e0147967–e0147967. 18 indexed citations
9.
Igawa, Takeshi, Ai Watanabe, Atsushi Suzuki, et al.. (2015). Inbreeding Ratio and Genetic Relationships among Strains of the Western Clawed Frog, Xenopus tropicalis. PLoS ONE. 10(7). e0133963–e0133963. 15 indexed citations
10.
Tinsley, R. C., et al.. (2015). Chytrid fungus infections in laboratory and introduced Xenopus laevis populations: assessing the risks for U.K. native amphibians. Biological Conservation. 184. 380–388. 13 indexed citations
11.
Abu‐Daya, Anita, et al.. (2012). Husbandry of Xenopus tropicalis. Methods in molecular biology. 917. 17–31. 8 indexed citations
12.
Pearl, Esther J., Robert M. Grainger, Matthew Guille, & Marko E. Horb. (2012). Development of xenopus resource centers: The national xenopus resource and the european xenopus resource center. genesis. 50(3). 155–163. 46 indexed citations
13.
Lloyd, Rhiannon E., Peter G. Foster, Matthew Guille, & D. Timothy J. Littlewood. (2012). Next generation sequencing and comparative analyses of Xenopus mitogenomes. BMC Genomics. 13(1). 496–496. 21 indexed citations
14.
Scarlett, Garry P., et al.. (2006). Identification of a structural and functional domain in xNAP1 involved in protein–protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Research. 34(17). 4893–4899. 5 indexed citations
15.
Abu‐Daya, Anita, et al.. (2003). Xenopus nucleosome assembly protein becomes tissue-restricted during development and can alter the expression of specific genes. Mechanisms of Development. 120(9). 1045–1057. 22 indexed citations
16.
Moore, Wendy & Matthew Guille. (2003). Preparation and Testing of Synthetic mRNA for Microinjection. Humana Press eBooks. 127. 99–110. 3 indexed citations
17.
Guille, Matthew, et al.. (2003). Immunohistochemistry of Xenopus Embryos. Humana Press eBooks. 127. 89–98. 8 indexed citations
18.
Guille, Matthew. (1999). Molecular methods in developmental biology : xenopus and zebrafish. Humana Press eBooks. 24 indexed citations
19.
Guille, Matthew & G.G. Kneale. (1997). Methods for the analysis of DNA-protein interactions. Molecular Biotechnology. 8(1). 35–52. 29 indexed citations
20.
Foss, A., Robert Alexander, Matthew Guille, et al.. (1995). Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Analysis in Ocular Melanomas. Ophthalmology. 102(3). 431–435. 34 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026