Matthew G. Barr

934 total citations
38 papers, 768 citations indexed

About

Matthew G. Barr is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Polymers and Plastics. According to data from OpenAlex, Matthew G. Barr has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 768 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 17 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 12 papers in Polymers and Plastics. Recurrent topics in Matthew G. Barr's work include Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (16 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (12 papers) and Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (6 papers). Matthew G. Barr is often cited by papers focused on Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (16 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (12 papers) and Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (6 papers). Matthew G. Barr collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Matthew G. Barr's co-authors include Paul C. Dastoor, Adam Fahy, Natalie P. Holmes, A. L. D. Kilcoyne, Xiaojing Zhou, Warwick J. Belcher, W. Allison, Krishna Feron, David J. Ward and Mats R. Andersson and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Journal of Applied Physics and Chemistry of Materials.

In The Last Decade

Matthew G. Barr

38 papers receiving 764 citations

Peers

Matthew G. Barr
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 509
  • Polymers and Plastics 331
  • Materials Chemistry 232
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 204
  • Biomedical Engineering 122
Replace Roopali Kukreja with:
Roopali Kukreja United States
Daniel Wegkamp Germany
Katherine Inzani United States
S. I. Bozhko Russia
S. Iacobucci Italy
Kaung‐Hsiung Wu Taiwan
M. S. Leung United States
Giti A. Khodaparast United States
Hung‐Chih Kan Taiwan
Kunal L. Tiwari Canada
Roopali Kukreja United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Matthew G. Barr
Matthew G. Barr · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Matthew G. Barr
Matthew G. Barr · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew G. Barr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew G. Barr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew G. Barr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew G. Barr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew G. Barr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew G. Barr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew G. Barr. The network helps show where Matthew G. Barr may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew G. Barr

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew G. Barr. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew G. Barr based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew G. Barr. Matthew G. Barr is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 2
2 1
3 8
4 7
5 8
6 9
7 3
8 2
9 22
10 12
11 28
12 13
13 10
14 2
15 40
16 3
17 27
18 9
19 11
20 7

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026