Matthew Dean
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
Papers in
-
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment 10
-
- Reproductive Physiology in Livestock 8
- Co-authors
- Joanna E. BurdetteDavid A. DavisDaniel D. LantvitAngela RussoBrian T. MurphyTova M. BergstenKatherine E. ZinkLaura M. Sanchez
- Journals
- Cancer Letters (4 papers)Journal of Visualized Experiments (2 papers)Animal Reproduction Science (2 papers)Oncogene (2 papers)The FASEB Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesEgypt
In The Last Decade
Matthew Dean
33 papers receiving 530 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Reproductive Medicine 179
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 47
- Agronomy and Crop Science 59
- Immunology 109
- Cancer Research 69
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Dean
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Dean more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Dean
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Dean. The network helps show where Matthew Dean may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Dean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 23 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 56 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 64 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 41 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 1 |
About Matthew Dean
Matthew Dean is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Agronomy and Crop Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Immunology and Genetics, having authored 35 papers that have together received 531 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (10 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (10 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (8 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (7 papers), Renal and related cancers (4 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (4 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (3 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (179 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (47 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (59 citations), Immunology (109 citations) and Cancer Research (69 citations). Matthew Dean has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Joanna E. Burdette, David A. Davis, Daniel D. Lantvit, Angela Russo, Brian T. Murphy, Tova M. Bergsten, Katherine E. Zink, Laura M. Sanchez, Jack Rose and Dimple Modi. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Letters, Journal of Visualized Experiments, Animal Reproduction Science, Oncogene and The FASEB Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.