Matthew D. Treiser

787 citations
18 papers · 481 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques 5
    • Breast Implant and Reconstruction 4
    • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 4
    • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research 3

Matthew D. Treiser

16 papers receiving 474 citations

Peers

Matthew D. Treiser
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Biophysics 49
  • Cell Biology 134
  • Biomedical Engineering 236
  • Biomaterials 70
  • Genetics 56
Replace Thuy U. Luu with:
Thuy U. Luu United States
Minjun Ahn South Korea
Annika Kengelbach‐Weigand Germany
Woojune Hur South Korea
Brian D. Cosgrove United States
Aashrith Saraswathibhatla United States
А.А. Горкун Russia
Isabel M. Bjørge Portugal
Nick R. M. Beijer Netherlands
Donggu Kang South Korea
Matthew D. Treiser relative to Thuy U. Luu United States Thuy U. Luu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Thuy U. Luu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew D. Treiser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew D. Treiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew D. Treiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew D. Treiser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew D. Treiser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew D. Treiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew D. Treiser. The network helps show where Matthew D. Treiser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew D. Treiser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew D. Treiser Line = papers co-authored together Matthew D. Treiser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2009232
2 200837
3 201435
4 201633
5 201833
6 201024
7 200820
8 200915
9 200714
10 200713
11 20099
12 20174
13 20164
14 20214
15 20193
16 20181
17 20220
18 20220

About Matthew D. Treiser

Matthew D. Treiser is a scholar working on Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology, Rehabilitation and Biomaterials, having authored 18 papers that have together received 481 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (5 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (4 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (4 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (3 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (2 papers), Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (2 papers) and Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (49 citations), Cell Biology (134 citations), Biomedical Engineering (236 citations), Biomaterials (70 citations) and Genetics (56 citations). Matthew D. Treiser has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Prabhas V. Moghe, Joachim Kohn, Simon Gordonov, Ioannis P. Androulakis, Daniel M. Cohen, Eric Yang, Christopher S. Chen, Er Liu, Matthew L. Iorio and Dennis P. Orgill. Their work appears in journals such as Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials and Cell Cycle.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact