Matthew D. Powers

1.1k total citations
36 papers, 731 citations indexed

About

Matthew D. Powers is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Matthew D. Powers has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 731 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 17 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 8 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Matthew D. Powers's work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (12 papers), Forest ecology and management (10 papers) and Fire effects on ecosystems (10 papers). Matthew D. Powers is often cited by papers focused on Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (12 papers), Forest ecology and management (10 papers) and Fire effects on ecosystems (10 papers). Matthew D. Powers collaborates with scholars based in United States and Romania. Matthew D. Powers's co-authors include Brian J. Palik, John T. Cavanaugh, Christopher R. Webster, Kurt S. Pregitzer, Martin F. Jurgensen, Randall K. Kolka, John B. Bradford, Linda M. Nagel, Joseph K. Bump and Rolf O. Peterson and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecological Applications, Plant and Soil and Forest Ecology and Management.

In The Last Decade

Matthew D. Powers

34 papers receiving 692 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Matthew D. Powers United States 15 329 301 129 119 90 36 731
Jean Liénard France 15 118 0.4× 141 0.5× 129 1.0× 30 0.3× 30 0.3× 40 666
Mingze Li China 18 241 0.7× 84 0.3× 182 1.4× 27 0.2× 72 0.8× 58 841
Ting Yun China 18 150 0.5× 328 1.1× 389 3.0× 131 1.1× 10 0.1× 62 1.0k
Athanasios Papaioannou Greece 17 54 0.2× 72 0.2× 49 0.4× 51 0.4× 26 0.3× 54 1.4k
Alexander Bucksch United States 20 79 0.2× 205 0.7× 225 1.7× 73 0.6× 21 0.2× 48 1.7k
Yuri Shendryk Australia 15 227 0.7× 155 0.5× 467 3.6× 58 0.5× 5 0.1× 22 820
K. Okada Japan 13 163 0.5× 117 0.4× 105 0.8× 36 0.3× 5 0.1× 34 642
Carlos Çabo Spain 15 164 0.5× 281 0.9× 281 2.2× 201 1.7× 3 0.0× 34 1.2k
Barry T. Wilson United States 13 563 1.7× 395 1.3× 527 4.1× 85 0.7× 3 0.0× 28 1.1k
Michael Karl United States 16 107 0.3× 166 0.6× 276 2.1× 5 0.0× 16 0.2× 44 548

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew D. Powers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew D. Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew D. Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew D. Powers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew D. Powers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew D. Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew D. Powers. The network helps show where Matthew D. Powers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew D. Powers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew D. Powers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew D. Powers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew D. Powers. Matthew D. Powers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Powers, Matthew D., et al.. (2024). Trade‐offs among management objectives in mature Douglas‐fir forests of the Pacific Northwest. Ecosphere. 15(4). 5 indexed citations
3.
Powers, Matthew D., et al.. (2022). Vegetation recovery rates provide insight into reburn severity in southwestern Oregon, USA. Forest Ecology and Management. 519. 120292–120292. 8 indexed citations
4.
Powers, Matthew D., et al.. (2019). Medium‐term effects of active management on the structure of mature Douglas‐fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) stands. Ecosphere. 10(8). 6 indexed citations
5.
Cavanaugh, John T. & Matthew D. Powers. (2017). ACL Rehabilitation Progression: Where Are We Now?. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine. 10(3). 289–296. 104 indexed citations
6.
Powers, Matthew D., et al.. (2017). Species, tree size, and overstory environment affect likelihood of ice storm damage to understory trees in a mature Douglas-fir forest. Forest Ecology and Management. 409. 777–788. 15 indexed citations
7.
Bradley, David M., Jonathan Chang, David Silver, et al.. (2015). Scene understanding for a high-mobility walking robot. 1144–1151. 17 indexed citations
8.
Handler, Stephen D., Christopher W. Swanston, Patricia Butler, et al.. (2014). Climate change vulnerabilities within the forestry sector for the Midwestern United States. 114–151. 5 indexed citations
9.
Powers, Matthew D., Randall K. Kolka, John B. Bradford, et al.. (2012). Carbon stocks across a chronosequence of thinned and unmanaged red pine (Pinus resinosa) stands. Ecological Applications. 22(4). 1297–1307. 45 indexed citations
10.
Powers, Matthew D., Kurt S. Pregitzer, Brian J. Palik, & Christopher R. Webster. (2010). The physiological basis for regeneration response to variable retention harvest treatments in three pine species. Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research. 84(1). 13–22. 9 indexed citations
11.
Powers, Matthew D., Brian J. Palik, John B. Bradford, Shawn Fraver, & Christopher R. Webster. (2010). Thinning method and intensity influence long-term mortality trends in a red pine forest. Forest Ecology and Management. 260(7). 1138–1148. 43 indexed citations
12.
Powers, Matthew D. & Linda M. Nagel. (2009). Pennsylvania sedge cover, forest management and Deer density influence tree regeneration dynamics in a northern hardwood forest. Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research. 82(3). 241–254. 21 indexed citations
13.
Powers, Matthew D. & Tucker Balch. (2009). A learning approach to integration of layers of a hybrid control architecture. 893–898. 1 indexed citations
14.
Powers, Matthew D., Kurt S. Pregitzer, Brian J. Palik, & Christopher R. Webster. (2009). Wood  13C,  18O and radial growth responses of residual red pine to variable retention harvesting. Tree Physiology. 30(3). 326–334. 32 indexed citations
15.
Bump, Joseph K., Christopher R. Webster, John A. Vucetich, et al.. (2009). Ungulate Carcasses Perforate Ecological Filters and Create Biogeochemical Hotspots in Forest Herbaceous Layers Allowing Trees a Competitive Advantage. Ecosystems. 12(6). 996–1007. 85 indexed citations
16.
Ding, Xu Chu, et al.. (2009). Executive decision support. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine. 16(2). 73–81. 30 indexed citations
17.
Powers, Matthew D. & Linda M. Nagel. (2008). Disturbance dynamics influence Carex pensylvanica abundance in a northern hardwood forest1. The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society. 135(3). 317–317. 13 indexed citations
18.
Powers, Matthew D., Kurt S. Pregitzer, & Brian J. Palik. (2008). Physiological performance of three pine species provides evidence for gap partitioning. Forest Ecology and Management. 256(12). 2127–2135. 30 indexed citations
19.
Powers, Matthew D., et al.. (2007). Control-driven mapping and planning. 3056–3061. 4 indexed citations
20.
Talhelm, Alan F., et al.. (2007). 13C labeling of plant assimilates using a simple canopy-scale open air system. Plant and Soil. 296(1-2). 227–234. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026