Matthew Chu

416 citations
13 papers · 301 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Matthew Chu

13 papers receiving 286 citations

Peers

Matthew Chu
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Emergency Medicine 93
  • Health Information Management 30
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 7
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 21
  • Health Informatics 6
Replace Kathy Haley with:
Kathy Haley United States
Abu N.G.A. Khan United States
Julie Spence Canada
Morten Breinholt Søvsø Denmark
Dan R. Thompson United States
Sally Jo Zuspan United States
Kathleen Murkowski United States
Tim Alex Lindskou Denmark
Jennifer L. Isenhour United States
Marie-Louise M. Coussa-Koniski Lebanon
Matthew Chu relative to Kathy Haley United States Kathy Haley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Kathy Haley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Chu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Chu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Chu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Chu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Chu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Chu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Chu. The network helps show where Matthew Chu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Chu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Chu Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Chu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 200953
2 200846
3 200941
4 201235
5 200723
6 201022
7 201421
8 200017
9 200613
10 200511
11 20078
12 20118
13 20193

About Matthew Chu

Matthew Chu is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Health Information Management, Surgery, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Toxicology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 301 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emergency and Acute Care Studies (4 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (2 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (1 paper), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (1 paper), Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (1 paper), Marine Toxins and Detection Methods (1 paper), Medical Coding and Health Information (1 paper) and Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (93 citations), Health Information Management (30 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (7 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (21 citations) and Health Informatics (6 citations). Matthew Chu has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Tanzania. Frequent co-authors include Michael Dinh, Raymond Kwok, Marie Gerdtz, Marnie Collins, Andrew Walker, Natisha Sands, Richard Paoloni, Dianne Crellin, Wendy Pollock and Julie Considine. Their work appears in journals such as Emergency Medicine Australasia, Addiction, Australasian Emergency Care, Emergency Medicine Journal and The Medical Journal of Australia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact