Matthew C. Ricker

432 total citations
28 papers, 341 citations indexed

About

Matthew C. Ricker is a scholar working on Ecology, Soil Science and Environmental Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Matthew C. Ricker has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 341 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Ecology, 13 papers in Soil Science and 8 papers in Environmental Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Matthew C. Ricker's work include Soil erosion and sediment transport (10 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (8 papers) and Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (6 papers). Matthew C. Ricker is often cited by papers focused on Soil erosion and sediment transport (10 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (8 papers) and Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (6 papers). Matthew C. Ricker collaborates with scholars based in United States, Chile and Slovakia. Matthew C. Ricker's co-authors include B. Graeme Lockaby, Mark H. Stolt, Michael S. Zavada, William H. Conner, Gregory B. Noe, Ken W. Krauss, Navideh Noori, Graeme Lockaby, Wayne C. Zipperer and Latif Kalin and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, The Science of The Total Environment and Soil Science Society of America Journal.

In The Last Decade

Matthew C. Ricker

26 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers

Matthew C. Ricker
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Ecology 160
  • Soil Science 143
  • Water Science and Technology 65
  • Global and Planetary Change 55
  • Environmental Chemistry 54
Replace Edmar A. Mazzi with:
Edmar A. Mazzi Brazil
Amelia R. Nelson United States
James P. Selegean United States
Kenneth M. Wacha United States
J.S. Chaplow United Kingdom
Danuta Urban Poland
G. W. Fraser Australia
Mitchell Donovan United States
Luiz Felippe Salemi Brazil
Edmar A. Mazzi Brazil View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Matthew C. Ricker
Matthew C. Ricker · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Matthew C. Ricker
Matthew C. Ricker · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew C. Ricker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew C. Ricker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew C. Ricker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew C. Ricker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew C. Ricker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew C. Ricker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew C. Ricker. The network helps show where Matthew C. Ricker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew C. Ricker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew C. Ricker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew C. Ricker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew C. Ricker. Matthew C. Ricker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 3
2 2
3 8
4 1
5 1
6 9
7 2
8 3
9 0
10 20
11 4
12 8
13 29
14 4
15 2
16 16
17
BELOWGROUND CARBON STOCKS IN AN OLD-GROWTH FLOODPLAIN FOREST: CONGAREE NATIONAL PARK, SOUTH CAROLINA
1
18 27
19 19
20 28

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026