Matthew C. Reeves

1.1k total citations
32 papers, 700 citations indexed

About

Matthew C. Reeves is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Ecology and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Matthew C. Reeves has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 700 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 25 papers in Ecology and 9 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Matthew C. Reeves's work include Rangeland and Wildlife Management (21 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (13 papers) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (8 papers). Matthew C. Reeves is often cited by papers focused on Rangeland and Wildlife Management (21 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (13 papers) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (8 papers). Matthew C. Reeves collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Austria. Matthew C. Reeves's co-authors include Maosheng Zhao, Steven W. Running, S. W. Running, L. Scott Baggett, Adam Moreno, Kevin C. Ryan, Thomas G. Thompson, Matthew G. Rollins, David D. Briske and Jeremy D. Maestas and has published in prestigious journals such as Global Change Biology, Climatic Change and International Journal of Remote Sensing.

In The Last Decade

Matthew C. Reeves

32 papers receiving 664 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Matthew C. Reeves United States 16 474 454 164 104 91 32 700
Elizabeth H. Boughton United States 18 486 1.0× 322 0.7× 221 1.3× 57 0.5× 36 0.4× 59 804
Jorge Luís Silva Brito Brazil 8 276 0.6× 287 0.6× 170 1.0× 109 1.0× 116 1.3× 30 820
N. Zambatis South Africa 13 310 0.7× 267 0.6× 308 1.9× 93 0.9× 50 0.5× 18 619
Raffaella Marzano Italy 16 264 0.6× 570 1.3× 334 2.0× 75 0.7× 80 0.9× 38 792
Polly C. Buotte United States 15 455 1.0× 582 1.3× 260 1.6× 36 0.3× 58 0.6× 22 927
Teresa B. Chapman United States 13 440 0.9× 582 1.3× 264 1.6× 52 0.5× 42 0.5× 21 780
Ephraim Mwangomo Tanzania 10 345 0.7× 179 0.4× 114 0.7× 101 1.0× 85 0.9× 12 620
Hossein Bashari Iran 14 263 0.6× 237 0.5× 134 0.8× 114 1.1× 76 0.8× 54 683
Rajen Bajgain United States 15 539 1.1× 531 1.2× 68 0.4× 60 0.6× 240 2.6× 23 893
Osvaldo Valeria Canada 16 222 0.5× 480 1.1× 274 1.7× 34 0.3× 156 1.7× 51 757

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew C. Reeves

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew C. Reeves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew C. Reeves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew C. Reeves more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew C. Reeves

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew C. Reeves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew C. Reeves. The network helps show where Matthew C. Reeves may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew C. Reeves

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew C. Reeves. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew C. Reeves based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew C. Reeves. Matthew C. Reeves is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Chambers, Jeanne C., Eva K. Strand, Lisa M. Ellsworth, et al.. (2024). Review of fuel treatment effects on fuels, fire behavior and ecological resilience in sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) ecosystems in the Western U.S.. Fire Ecology. 20(1). 7 indexed citations
3.
Chamberlain, James M., et al.. (2024). Provisioning food and medicine from public forests in the United States. Trees Forests and People. 19. 100738–100738. 1 indexed citations
4.
Wilmer, Hailey, et al.. (2024). Loss of seasonal ranges reshapes transhumant adaptive capacity: Thirty-five years at the US Sheep Experiment Station. Agriculture and Human Values. 42(1). 545–563. 4 indexed citations
5.
Abatzoglou, John T., Erin J. Belval, Erica Fleishman, et al.. (2024). Physical, social, and biological attributes for improved understanding and prediction of wildfires: FPA FOD-Attributes dataset. Earth system science data. 16(6). 3045–3060. 7 indexed citations
6.
Costanza, Jennifer, Frank Koch, & Matthew C. Reeves. (2023). Future exposure of forest ecosystems to multi‐year drought in the United States. Ecosphere. 14(5). 15 indexed citations
7.
Chambers, Jeanne C., Jessi L. Brown, Matthew C. Reeves, et al.. (2023). Fuel treatment response groups for fire-prone sagebrush landscapes. Fire Ecology. 19(1). 5 indexed citations
8.
Ellsworth, Lisa M., Beth A. Newingham, Eva K. Strand, et al.. (2022). Fuel reduction treatments reduce modeled fire intensity in the sagebrush steppe. Ecosphere. 13(5). 20 indexed citations
9.
Reeves, Matthew C., et al.. (2022). Earlier green-up and senescence of temperate United States rangelands under future climate. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment. 8(4). 5389–5405. 6 indexed citations
10.
Hao, Wei Min, Matthew C. Reeves, L. Scott Baggett, et al.. (2021). Wetter environment and increased grazing reduced the area burned in northern Eurasia from 2002 to 2016. Biogeosciences. 18(8). 2559–2572. 9 indexed citations
11.
Taylor, David T., et al.. (2021). An economic valuation of federal and private grazing land ecosystem services supported by beef cattle ranching in the United States. Translational Animal Science. 5(3). txab054–txab054. 15 indexed citations
12.
Jones, Matthew, Nathaniel Robinson, David E. Naugle, et al.. (2021). Annual and 16-Day Rangeland Production Estimates for the Western United States. Rangeland Ecology & Management. 77. 112–117. 67 indexed citations
13.
Allred, Brady, Megan K. Creutzburg, John C. Carlson, et al.. (2021). Guiding principles for using satellite-derived maps in rangeland management. Rangelands. 44(1). 78–86. 25 indexed citations
14.
Reeves, Matthew C., et al.. (2020). An Assessment of Production Trends on the Great Plains from 1984 to 2017. Rangeland Ecology & Management. 78. 165–179. 42 indexed citations
15.
Reeves, Matthew C. & L. Scott Baggett. (2014). A remote sensing protocol for identifying rangelands with degraded productive capacity. Ecological Indicators. 43. 172–182. 42 indexed citations
16.
Reeves, Matthew C., et al.. (2014). Estimating climate change effects on net primary production of rangelands in the United States. Climatic Change. 126(3-4). 429–442. 82 indexed citations
17.
Reeves, Matthew C., et al.. (2012). A detrimental soil disturbance prediction model for ground-based timber harvesting. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 42(5). 821–830. 23 indexed citations
18.
Reeves, Matthew C. & Donald J. Bedunah. (2006). A comparison of low cost satellite imagery for pastoral planning projects in Central Asia. 39. 2 indexed citations
19.
Reeves, Matthew C., Maosheng Zhao, & Steven W. Running. (2006). Applying Improved Estimates of MODIS Productivity to Characterize Grassland Vegetation Dynamics. Rangeland Ecology & Management. 59(1). 1–10. 44 indexed citations
20.
Keane, Robert E., et al.. (2006). Chapter 12 - Mapping wildland fuel across large regions for the LANDFIRE Prototype Project. 175. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026