Matthew C. Bobel
- Oncology top 10%
- Surgery
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Gastroenterology
- Co-authors
- W. IsselhardFerenc HuttererG. BueßH. PichlmaierAndile DubeSergio M. NavarroDennis MazingiChris Lavy
- Topics
- Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers)Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (4 papers)Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (3 papers)
- Cited by
- OncologySurgeryGastroenterology
- Journals
- Scientific ReportsThe American Journal of SurgeryJournal of the American College of Surgeons
- Partner nations
- United StatesMalaysiaZimbabwe
In The Last Decade
Matthew C. Bobel
12 papers receiving 320 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Oncology 277
- Surgery 236
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 61
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 26
- Gastroenterology 18
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew C. Bobel
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew C. Bobel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew C. Bobel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew C. Bobel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew C. Bobel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew C. Bobel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew C. Bobel. The network helps show where Matthew C. Bobel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew C. Bobel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew C. Bobel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew C. Bobel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew C. Bobel. Matthew C. Bobel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | [A system for a transanal endoscopic rectum operation]. | 258 |
About Matthew C. Bobel
Matthew C. Bobel is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation and Oncology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 329 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (4 papers) and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (277 citations), Surgery (236 citations) and Gastroenterology (18 citations). Matthew C. Bobel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Malaysia and Zimbabwe. Frequent co-authors include W. Isselhard, Ferenc Hutterer, G. Bueß, H. Pichlmaier, Andile Dube, Sergio M. Navarro, Dennis Mazingi, Chris Lavy, Wolfgang B. Gaertner and Julia L. Nugent. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, The American Journal of Surgery and Journal of the American College of Surgeons.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.