Daniel Enter

432 total citations
17 papers, 303 citations indexed

About

Daniel Enter is a scholar working on Surgery, Biomedical Engineering and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Enter has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 303 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Surgery, 8 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 4 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Daniel Enter's work include Surgical Simulation and Training (7 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (5 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers). Daniel Enter is often cited by papers focused on Surgical Simulation and Training (7 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (5 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers). Daniel Enter collaborates with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Taiwan. Daniel Enter's co-authors include Eric S. Hungness, Byron F. Santos, Nathaniel J. Soper, Edward D. Auyang, Xiaoying Lou, Richard Lee, Edward D. Verrier, Patrick M. McCarthy, Adin‐Cristian Andrei and George L. Hicks and has published in prestigious journals such as Gastroenterology, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and The Annals of Thoracic Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Enter

13 papers receiving 295 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Enter United States 10 246 75 72 69 33 17 303
Farid Kehdy United States 9 341 1.4× 30 0.4× 60 0.8× 123 1.8× 75 2.3× 20 379
Todd Wilson United States 10 426 1.7× 61 0.8× 43 0.6× 87 1.3× 53 1.6× 28 458
Ludovica Guerriero Italy 11 266 1.1× 17 0.2× 49 0.7× 64 0.9× 98 3.0× 24 304
Alexander Buia Germany 7 216 0.9× 50 0.7× 77 1.1× 55 0.8× 6 0.2× 20 291
Mouza T. Goova United States 7 384 1.6× 40 0.5× 120 1.7× 101 1.5× 68 2.1× 10 416
Shinya Takazawa Japan 12 329 1.3× 19 0.3× 39 0.5× 76 1.1× 9 0.3× 35 351
J. Gagermeier United States 9 154 0.6× 81 1.1× 21 0.3× 133 1.9× 52 1.6× 18 311
Mubashir Mulla United Kingdom 7 466 1.9× 16 0.2× 53 0.7× 60 0.9× 9 0.3× 13 544
Mustafa Paç Türkiye 10 223 0.9× 101 1.3× 72 1.0× 107 1.6× 6 0.2× 52 349
Alexander G. Nagy Canada 11 409 1.7× 24 0.3× 55 0.8× 203 2.9× 15 0.5× 23 486

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Enter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Enter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Enter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Enter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Enter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Enter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Enter. The network helps show where Daniel Enter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Enter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Enter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Enter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Enter. Daniel Enter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Milligan, Gregory P., et al.. (2022). Angiotensin II In The Treatment Of Post Cardiopulmonary Vasoplegic Shock And Primary Graft Dysfunction. Journal of Cardiac Failure. 28(5). S122–S122.
2.
Enter, Daniel, Richard H. Feins, Richard Lee, et al.. (2021). Training less-experienced faculty improves reliability of skills assessment in cardiac surgery. UNC Libraries.
3.
Kopecky, Kimberly, et al.. (2021). Drugs, Bugs, and the ECMO Unplugged: A Case of a 61-year-old with Cardiogenic Shock and Utility of Palliative Bedside ECMO De-Escalation. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 40(4). S469–S469.
4.
Hamman, Baron L., Albert Henry, Robert F. Hebeler, et al.. (2020). High-quality cardiac surgery through teamwork. Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings. 34(1). 215–220.
5.
Michel, Eriberto, Daniel Enter, Michael C. Mongé, et al.. (2018). Bridge to Transplantation With Long‐Term Mechanical Assist Devices in Adults With Transposition of the Great Arteries. Artificial Organs. 43(1). 90–96. 14 indexed citations
6.
Enter, Daniel, Jane Kruse, Zhi Li, et al.. (2017). Prothrombin Complex Concentrate Reduces Blood Product Utilization in Heart Transplantation. Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 37(10). 1215–1220. 15 indexed citations
7.
Enter, Daniel, Jane Kruse, Adin‐Cristian Andrei, et al.. (2016). A contemporary analysis of pulmonary hypertension in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery: Is this a risk factor?. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 151(5). 1288–1299. 18 indexed citations
8.
Wu, Chun‐Yi, Xiaobing Wang, Liping Meng, et al.. (2016). Rapid Discovery of Functional Small Molecule Ligands against Proteomic Targets through Library-Against-Library Screening. ACS Combinatorial Science. 18(6). 320–329. 8 indexed citations
9.
Enter, Daniel, Jane Kruse, Adin‐Cristian Andrei, et al.. (2016). Prothrombin Complex Concentrate Reduces Intraoperative Blood Product Utilization in Heart Transplantation. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 35(4). S293–S293. 2 indexed citations
10.
Enter, Daniel, Richard Lee, James I. Fann, et al.. (2015). “Top Gun” Competition: Motivation and Practice Narrows the Technical Skill Gap Among New Cardiothoracic Surgery Residents. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 99(3). 870–876. 27 indexed citations
11.
Lou, Xiaoying, Richard H. Feins, Daniel Enter, et al.. (2014). Training less-experienced faculty improves reliability of skills assessment in cardiac surgery. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 148(6). 2491–2496.e2. 13 indexed citations
12.
Enter, Daniel, Xiaoying Lou, Dawn S. Hui, et al.. (2014). Practice improves performance on a coronary anastomosis simulator, attending surgeon supervision does not. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 149(1). 12–17.e2. 17 indexed citations
13.
Lee, Richard, Daniel Enter, Xiaoying Lou, et al.. (2013). The Joint Council on Thoracic Surgery Education Coronary Artery Assessment Tool Has High Interrater Reliability. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 95(6). 2064–2070. 12 indexed citations
14.
Lou, Xiaoying, Daniel Enter, Carolyn E. Reed, et al.. (2013). Sustained Supervised Practice on a Coronary Anastomosis Simulator Increases Medical Student Interest in Surgery, Unsupervised Practice Does Not. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 95(6). 2057–2063. 18 indexed citations
15.
Auyang, Edward D., Byron F. Santos, Daniel Enter, Eric S. Hungness, & Nathaniel J. Soper. (2011). Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES®): a technical review. Surgical Endoscopy. 25(10). 3135–3148. 89 indexed citations
16.
Santos, Byron F., Daniel Enter, Nathaniel J. Soper, & Eric S. Hungness. (2010). Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS™) versus standard laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of performance using a surgical simulator. Surgical Endoscopy. 25(2). 483–490. 69 indexed citations
17.
Santos, Byron F., Daniel Enter, Nathaniel J. Soper, & Eric S. Hungness. (2010). W1949 Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Simulator Training Improves Performance. Gastroenterology. 138(5). S–906. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026