Matthew Bell

2.1k citations
54 papers · 1.6k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Matthew Bell

50 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Matthew Bell
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Small Animals 312
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 336
  • Forestry 27
  • Genetics 197
  • Environmental Chemistry 53
Replace A. Waterhouse with:
A. Waterhouse United Kingdom
M.G.G. Chagunda United Kingdom
Eliel González García France
Doris Pellerin Canada
Conrad P. Ferris United Kingdom
Víctor E. Cabrera United States
Anna Hessle Sweden
A. Tamburini Italy
A. Sandrucci Italy
P. Crosson Ireland
Matthew Bell relative to A. Waterhouse United Kingdom A. Waterhouse's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
A. Waterhouse · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Bell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Bell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Bell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Bell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Bell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Bell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Bell. The network helps show where Matthew Bell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Bell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Bell Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Bell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006239
2 2008116
3 2022104
4 2011100
5 201992
6 200774
7 201171
8 202061
9 201057
10 201455
11 201343
12 201841
13 201439
14 201638
15 202138
16 201337
17 201036
18 201133
19 201230
20 200729

About Matthew Bell

Matthew Bell is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Forestry, Small Animals, Soil Science and Genetics, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (8 papers), Pasture and Agricultural Systems (7 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (5 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (5 papers), Smart Agriculture and AI (4 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (3 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (3 papers) and Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (312 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (336 citations), Forestry (27 citations), Genetics (197 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (53 citations). Matthew Bell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David J. Roberts, Marie J. Haskell, Alistair B Lawrence, G. Simm, Geraldine Russell, E. Wall, Richard Eckard, Philip C. Garnsworthy, J.E. Pryce and Alistair William Stott. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Dairy Science, Animals, Agronomy, Livestock Science and Animal Production Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact