Matthew A. Scult
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Faith M. GunningJohn W. DenningerConor ListonHerbert BensonGregory L. FricchioneAhmad R. HaririElyse R. ParkAna-Maria Vranceanu
- Topics
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (9 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsItaly
In The Last Decade
Matthew A. Scult
25 papers receiving 799 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Cognitive Neuroscience 249
- Clinical Psychology 248
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 189
- Applied Psychology 124
- Psychiatry and Mental health 111
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew A. Scult
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew A. Scult's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew A. Scult with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew A. Scult more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew A. Scult
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew A. Scult. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew A. Scult. The network helps show where Matthew A. Scult may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew A. Scult
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew A. Scult. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew A. Scult based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew A. Scult. Matthew A. Scult is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 100 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 104 | |
| 6 | 36 | |
| 7 | 49 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 84 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 150 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 53 | |
| 20 | 26 |
About Matthew A. Scult
Matthew A. Scult is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Applied Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 818 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (9 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (124 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (189 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (249 citations). Matthew A. Scult has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Faith M. Gunning, John W. Denninger, Conor Liston, Herbert Benson, Gregory L. Fricchione, Ahmad R. Hariri, Elyse R. Park, Ana-Maria Vranceanu, Jonathan A. Lerner and Lara Traeger. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and Cerebral Cortex.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.