Matt Sleat
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 6
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought 5
- War, Ethics, and Justification 3
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 2
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 16
- Political Theory and Influence 5
- Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy 5
-
- Critical Theory and Philosophy 6
- Law top 5%
- Co-authors
- Enzo RossiEdward Hall
- Journals
- Political Theory (3 papers)European Journal of Political Theory (2 papers)Social Philosophy and Policy (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Matt Sleat
27 papers receiving 697 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Philosophy 339
- Political Science and International Relations 666
- Sociology and Political Science 343
- Law 26
- Public Administration 7
Countries citing papers authored by Matt Sleat
This map shows the geographic impact of Matt Sleat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matt Sleat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matt Sleat more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matt Sleat
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matt Sleat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matt Sleat. The network helps show where Matt Sleat may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Matt Sleat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 27 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 34 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 9 | A Defence of the Radical Version of the Asymmetry Objection to Political Liberalism | 2014 | 1 |
| 10 | 2014 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 74 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 74 | |
| 14 | Realism in Normative Political Theorybreakdown → | 2014 | 224 |
| 15 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 17 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2006 | 2 |
About Matt Sleat
Matt Sleat is a scholar working on Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Law and Infectious Diseases, having authored 29 papers that have together received 768 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (16 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (6 papers), Political Theory and Influence (5 papers), Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy (5 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (5 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (3 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (339 citations), Political Science and International Relations (666 citations), Sociology and Political Science (343 citations), Law (26 citations) and Public Administration (7 citations). Matt Sleat has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Enzo Rossi and Edward Hall. Their work appears in journals such as Political Theory, European Journal of Political Theory, Social Philosophy and Policy, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy and Philosophy Compass.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.