Matt Probert

30.9k total citations · 3 hit papers
64 papers, 25.1k citations indexed

About

Matt Probert is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Condensed Matter Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Matt Probert has authored 64 papers receiving a total of 25.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Materials Chemistry, 29 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 16 papers in Condensed Matter Physics. Recurrent topics in Matt Probert's work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (13 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (9 papers) and Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research (7 papers). Matt Probert is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (13 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (9 papers) and Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research (7 papers). Matt Probert collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Türkiye. Matt Probert's co-authors include P. J. Hasnip, Chris J. Pickard, Stewart J. Clark, M. C. Payne, Matthew Segall, Keith Refson, Philip J. D. Lindan, Nathan Luke Abraham, Jonathan R. Yates and Jun Yuan and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nature Communications and The Journal of Chemical Physics.

In The Last Decade

Matt Probert

61 papers receiving 24.6k citations

Hit Papers

First principles methods using CASTEP 2002 2026 2010 2018 2005 2002 2015 2.5k 5.0k 7.5k 10.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Matt Probert United Kingdom 19 18.1k 7.2k 5.9k 3.1k 2.9k 64 25.1k
P. J. Hasnip United Kingdom 16 16.7k 0.9× 6.6k 0.9× 5.9k 1.0× 2.8k 0.9× 2.9k 1.0× 42 23.4k
Stewart J. Clark United Kingdom 50 22.4k 1.2× 9.4k 1.3× 8.4k 1.4× 4.4k 1.4× 3.1k 1.1× 225 32.6k
Richard Dronskowski Germany 63 18.0k 1.0× 7.4k 1.0× 5.6k 0.9× 2.3k 0.7× 2.6k 0.9× 593 26.1k
Koichi Momma Japan 15 18.2k 1.0× 9.6k 1.3× 8.6k 1.4× 2.8k 0.9× 2.0k 0.7× 77 28.4k
S. L. Dudarev United Kingdom 58 16.1k 0.9× 4.3k 0.6× 4.9k 0.8× 3.1k 1.0× 3.2k 1.1× 268 22.5k
Keith Refson United Kingdom 40 11.2k 0.6× 4.2k 0.6× 4.4k 0.7× 2.4k 0.8× 1.4k 0.5× 143 17.9k
Julian D. Gale Australia 70 19.1k 1.1× 8.6k 1.2× 3.1k 0.5× 6.4k 2.0× 1.4k 0.5× 306 30.5k
Mark R. Pederson United States 49 17.5k 1.0× 6.5k 0.9× 4.9k 0.8× 9.7k 3.1× 2.1k 0.7× 195 28.1k
Koblar Alan Jackson United States 38 15.4k 0.8× 5.6k 0.8× 3.5k 0.6× 8.3k 2.6× 2.0k 0.7× 119 24.1k
Blas P. Uberuaga United States 54 21.2k 1.2× 8.1k 1.1× 1.9k 0.3× 3.6k 1.2× 3.6k 1.3× 309 28.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Matt Probert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matt Probert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matt Probert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matt Probert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matt Probert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matt Probert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matt Probert. The network helps show where Matt Probert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matt Probert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matt Probert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matt Probert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matt Probert. Matt Probert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Frost, William, et al.. (2024). Towards MnN as a replacement for IrMn. Scientific Reports. 14(1). 21944–21944.
2.
Lawrence, Robert A., et al.. (2023). Magnetic Transition State Searching: Beyond the Static Ion Approximation. Magnetochemistry. 9(2). 42–42. 4 indexed citations
3.
Keal, Thomas W., Alexey A. Sokol, Matt Probert, et al.. (2022). Materials and Molecular Modeling at the Exascale. Computing in Science & Engineering. 24(1). 36–45. 5 indexed citations
4.
Probert, Matt, et al.. (2022). Systematic Comparison of Genetic Algorithm and Basin Hopping Approaches to the Global Optimization of Si(111) Surface Reconstructions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 126(19). 3043–3056. 8 indexed citations
5.
Karaca, Ertuğrul, P.J. Byrne, P. J. Hasnip, & Matt Probert. (2022). Prediction of phonon-mediated superconductivity in new Ti-based M$$_2$$AX phases. Scientific Reports. 12(1). 13198–13198. 20 indexed citations
6.
Hasnip, P. J., et al.. (2019). Effective modelling of the Seebeck coefficient of Fe 2 VAl. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter. 32(12). 125401–125401. 6 indexed citations
7.
Plekhanov, Evgeny, P. J. Hasnip, Matt Probert, et al.. (2018). Many-body renormalisation of forces in f-materials. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations
8.
Hong, Jinhua, Yanlei Wang, Anle Wang, et al.. (2017). Atomistic dynamics of sulfur-deficient high-symmetry grain boundaries in molybdenum disulfide. Nanoscale. 9(29). 10312–10320. 22 indexed citations
9.
Hong, Jinhua, Zhixin Hu, Matt Probert, et al.. (2015). Exploring atomic defects in molybdenum disulphide monolayers. Nature Communications. 6(1). 6293–6293. 1236 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Fujita, Naoya, P. J. Hasnip, Matt Probert, & Jun Yuan. (2015). Theoretical study of core-loss electron energy-loss spectroscopy at graphene nanoribbon edges. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter. 27(30). 305301–305301. 5 indexed citations
11.
Li, Xin-Zheng, Brent Walker, Matt Probert, et al.. (2013). Classical and quantum ordering of protons in cold solid hydrogen under megabar pressures. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter. 25(8). 85402–85402. 29 indexed citations
12.
13.
Li, Xin-Zheng, Matt Probert, Ali Alavi, & Angelos Michaelides. (2010). Quantum Nature of the Proton in Water-Hydroxyl Overlayers on Metal Surfaces. Physical Review Letters. 104(6). 66102–66102. 97 indexed citations
14.
Probert, Matt. (2009). Computational Physics of Carbon Nanotubes, by H. Rafii-Tabar. Contemporary Physics. 51(1). 92–93. 1 indexed citations
15.
Eames, Christopher, et al.. (2006). STM andab initiostudy of holmium nanowires on a Ge(111) surface. Physical Review B. 74(19). 5 indexed citations
16.
Quigley, David & Matt Probert. (2005). Progression of phase behavior for a sequence of model core-softened potentials. Physical Review E. 72(6). 61202–61202. 4 indexed citations
17.
Quigley, David & Matt Probert. (2005). Constant pressure Langevin dynamics: theory and application. Computer Physics Communications. 169(1-3). 322–325. 13 indexed citations
18.
Segall, Matthew, Philip J. D. Lindan, Matt Probert, et al.. (2002). First-principles simulation: ideas, illustrations and the CASTEP code. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter. 14(11). 2717–2744. 10348 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Homans, Steve W., et al.. (1998). Probing Carbohydrate-Protein Interactions by High-Resolution NMR Spectroscopy. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 435. 29–38. 3 indexed citations
20.
Probert, Matt & Alastair I. M. Rae. (1995). Nature of the Irreversibility Line in High-Temperature Superconductors. Physical Review Letters. 75(9). 1835–1838. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026