This map shows the geographic impact of Matt Mountain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matt Mountain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matt Mountain more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matt Mountain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matt Mountain. The network helps show where Matt Mountain may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matt Mountain
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matt Mountain.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matt Mountain based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Matt Mountain. Matt Mountain is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tumlinson, Jason, Jonathan W. Arenberg, Matt Mountain, et al.. (2019). The Next Great Observatories: How Can We Get There?. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 51(7). 173.
2.
Hammel, Heidi B., et al.. (2019). The Carl Sagan Observatory: A Visionary Space Telescope. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 51(7). 192.
Postman, Marc, T. M. Brown, Kenneth R. Sembach, et al.. (2011). The Advanced Technology Large Aperture Space Telescope (ATLAST): Science Drivers and Technology Developments. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).5 indexed citations
Windhorst, Rogier A., John Mather, Mark Clampin, et al.. (2009). Galaxies Across Cosmic Time with JWST. 2010. 317.1 indexed citations
9.
Mountain, Matt, Roeland P. van der Marel, Rémi Soummer, et al.. (2009). Comparison of optical observational capabilities for the coming decades: ground versus space. 2010. 12.2 indexed citations
10.
Postman, Marc, Matt Mountain, Michael E. Van Steenberg, et al.. (2009). Ultraviolet Astronomy Beyond 2020. AIP conference proceedings. 318–325.4 indexed citations
Sabbi, Elena, J. S. Gallagher, L. J. Smith, D. F. de Mello, & Matt Mountain. (2008). Holmberg IX: The Nearest Young Galaxy. The Astrophysical Journal. 676(2). L113–L117.20 indexed citations
Clampin, Mark, Lee D. Feinberg, William L. Hayden, et al.. (2003). Status of the JWST Observatory Design. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. 203.1 indexed citations
15.
Ragazzoni, Roberto, et al.. (2000). Adaptive optics challenges for the ELTs. European Southern Observatory Conference and Workshop Proceedings. 57. 168.3 indexed citations
16.
Simons, D. A., et al.. (2000). The Gemini instrument program. 28–39.1 indexed citations
17.
Gillett, F. C. & Matt Mountain. (1998). On the Comparative Performance of an 8 M NGST and a Ground Based 8 M Optical/IR Telescope. ASPC. 133. 42.8 indexed citations
18.
Serjeant, S., S. Rawlings, Mark Lacy, et al.. (1998). A spectroscopic study of IRAS F10214 + 4724. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 298(2). 321–331.15 indexed citations
19.
Gillett, F. C., et al.. (1996). The Gemini Telescopes Project (Invited Paper). 4. 75.1 indexed citations
20.
Mountain, Matt, et al.. (1987). Lung Cancer: Current Status and Prospects for the Future.14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.