Matt Cutts
Impact in
- Human-Computer Interaction top 0.5%
- Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
-
- Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Papers in
-
- Augmented Reality Applications 3
- Advanced Vision and Imaging 1
- Geology 2
- 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage 2
- Co-authors
- Henry Fuchs (5 shared papers)Adam Lake (2 shared papers)Greg Welch (2 shared papers)Ramesh Raskar (2 shared papers)Elaine Cohen (1 shared paper)Samuel Drake (1 shared paper)Robert C. Zeleznik (1 shared paper)Richard F. Riesenfeld (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- XRDS Crossroads The ACM Magazine for Students (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Matt Cutts
6 papers receiving 562 citations
Matt Cutts's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Human-Computer Interaction 442
- Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 140
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 471
- Media Technology 140
- Geology 40
Countries citing papers authored by Matt Cutts
This map shows the geographic impact of Matt Cutts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matt Cutts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matt Cutts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matt Cutts
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matt Cutts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matt Cutts. The network helps show where Matt Cutts may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Matt Cutts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The office of the future Hit paper breakdown → | 1998 | 585 |
| 2 | 1998 | 23 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 12 | |
| 4 | An Immersive Tool for Wide-Area Collaborative Design | 1998 | 8 |
| 5 | 3D Talking Heads: Image Based Modeling at Interactive rates using Structured Light Projection | 1998 | 4 |
| 6 | 1997 | 2 |
About Matt Cutts
Matt Cutts is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Geology, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Aerospace Engineering and Building and Construction, having authored 6 papers that have together received 634 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Augmented Reality Applications (3 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (2 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (2 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (1 paper), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (1 paper), Advanced Vision and Imaging (1 paper), Teleoperation and Haptic Systems (1 paper) and BIM and Construction Integration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (442 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (140 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (471 citations), Media Technology (140 citations) and Geology (40 citations). Matt Cutts has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Henry Fuchs, Adam Lake, Greg Welch, Ramesh Raskar, Elaine Cohen, Samuel Drake, Robert C. Zeleznik, Richard F. Riesenfeld, Andrew Forsberg and Voicu Popescu. Their work appears in journals such as XRDS Crossroads The ACM Magazine for Students.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.