Matt Crook

421 citations
14 papers · 289 · h-index 7

Impact in

  • Aging top 2%
    • Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
    • Parasites and Host Interactions

Papers in

    • Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms 9
    • Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research 1
    • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways 1

Matt Crook

11 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers

Matt Crook
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Aging 141
  • Parasitology 100
  • Small Animals 46
  • Ecology 104
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 22
Replace Jonathan D. Stoltzfus with:
Jonathan D. Stoltzfus United States
Kathryn S. Evans United States
Eric Déan United States
Lijiang Long United States
Susan C. Nulf United States
Abuelhassan Elshazly Younis Egypt
David Hunt United States
Vicky L. Hunt United Kingdom
Gabriele Wildenburg Germany
Mike Dante United States
Matt Crook relative to Jonathan D. Stoltzfus United States Jonathan D. Stoltzfus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jonathan D. Stoltzfus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matt Crook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matt Crook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matt Crook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matt Crook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matt Crook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matt Crook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matt Crook. The network helps show where Matt Crook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Matt Crook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matt Crook Line = papers co-authored together Matt Crook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2013105
2 200457
3 200554
4 201629
5 201015
6 20167
7 20146
8 20136
9 20134
10 20223
11 20192
12
Coach Class to Orbit: the NPS CubeSat Launcher
20091
13 20220
14 20200

About Matt Crook

Matt Crook is a scholar working on Aging, Molecular Biology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Ecology and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (9 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (3 papers), Parasites and Host Interactions (2 papers), Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine (2 papers), Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (2 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (2 papers), Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research (1 paper) and Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (141 citations), Parasitology (100 citations), Small Animals (46 citations), Ecology (104 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (22 citations). Matt Crook has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mark Viney, Warwick N. Grant, Faye J. Thompson, Fiona Thompson, Wendy Hanna‐Rose, Keith J. Mickolajczyk, Timothy Jegla, Matthew Shorey, William O. Hancock and Melissa M. Rolls. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal for Parasitology, G3 Genes Genomes Genetics, Developmental Dynamics, Nature Communications and Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact