Mathias Hjort
About
In The Last Decade
Mathias Hjort
5 papers receiving 151 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 79
- Cell Biology 76
- Surgery 51
- Physiology 37
- Molecular Biology 33
Countries citing papers authored by Mathias Hjort
This map shows the geographic impact of Mathias Hjort's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathias Hjort with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathias Hjort more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mathias Hjort
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mathias Hjort. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mathias Hjort. The network helps show where Mathias Hjort may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mathias Hjort
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mathias Hjort. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mathias Hjort based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mathias Hjort. Mathias Hjort is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 53 | |
| 4 | 72 | |
| 5 | [Late development of carotid dissection after traffic accident]. | 1 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.