Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003
2006472 citationsP C Shrimpton, Mathew Hillier et al.British Journal of Radiologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Mathew Hillier
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mathew Hillier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathew Hillier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathew Hillier more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mathew Hillier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mathew Hillier. The network helps show where Mathew Hillier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mathew Hillier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mathew Hillier.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mathew Hillier based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mathew Hillier. Mathew Hillier is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Fluck, A, et al.. (2017). eExam symposium: Design decisions and implementation experience. Figshare.4 indexed citations
10.
Hillier, Mathew & A Fluck. (2017). Transforming exams - how IT works for BYOD e-Exams. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 100–105.1 indexed citations
11.
Fluck, A & Mathew Hillier. (2016). Innovative assessment with eExams. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).5 indexed citations
Crisp, G. T., et al.. (2010). Assessing students in Second Life - some options. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide). 2010(1). 256–261.2 indexed citations
Shrimpton, P C, Mathew Hillier, Maria Lewis, & M Dunn. (2006). National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. British Journal of Radiology. 79(948). 968–980.472 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Hillier, Mathew & Doug Vogel. (2003). Soft Methods for Systems Projects in SMEs. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 95.
17.
Hillier, Mathew, et al.. (2003). Sophistication of Online Tourism Websites in Hong Kong: An Exploratory Study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1–12.10 indexed citations
18.
Hillier, Mathew. (2002). Thinking about systems design problems using the T.O.P2 framework. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.3 indexed citations
19.
Hillier, Mathew. (2002). Multilingual website usability: cultural context. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 1–14.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.