Mateusz Blukacz
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Health top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Paweł F. NowakTadeusz MarekKrystyna GolonkaJustyna Mojsa‐KajaMagda GawłowskaMagdalena MijasMariola Paruzel‐CzachuraAndrzej Galbarczyk
- Topics
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers)Ethics in Business and Education (3 papers)Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- PolandUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Mateusz Blukacz
14 papers receiving 352 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- General Health Professions 114
- Clinical Psychology 112
- Social Psychology 96
- Health 73
- Sociology and Political Science 62
Countries citing papers authored by Mateusz Blukacz
This map shows the geographic impact of Mateusz Blukacz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mateusz Blukacz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mateusz Blukacz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mateusz Blukacz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mateusz Blukacz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mateusz Blukacz. The network helps show where Mateusz Blukacz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mateusz Blukacz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mateusz Blukacz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mateusz Blukacz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mateusz Blukacz. Mateusz Blukacz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 140 | |
| 13 | 87 | |
| 14 | 61 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | (Ko)warianty efektywności nauczania. Wyniki badania w klasach IV–VI | 4 |
About Mateusz Blukacz
Mateusz Blukacz is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, General Social Sciences and Statistics and Probability, having authored 16 papers that have together received 369 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (3 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (73 citations), Clinical Psychology (112 citations) and Applied Psychology (27 citations). Mateusz Blukacz has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Paweł F. Nowak, Tadeusz Marek, Krystyna Golonka, Justyna Mojsa‐Kaja, Magda Gawłowska, Magdalena Mijas, Mariola Paruzel‐Czachura, Andrzej Galbarczyk, Grażyna Jasieńska and Dominic Davies. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.