Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Maryellen Cameron
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Maryellen Cameron's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maryellen Cameron with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maryellen Cameron more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Maryellen Cameron
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maryellen Cameron. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maryellen Cameron. The network helps show where Maryellen Cameron may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maryellen Cameron
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maryellen Cameron.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maryellen Cameron based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Maryellen Cameron. Maryellen Cameron is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hughes, John M., Maryellen Cameron, & Kevin D. Crowley. (1991). ORDERING OF DIVALENT CATIONS IN THE APATITE STRUCTURE : CRYSTAL STRUCTURE REFINEMENTS OF NATURAL MN- AND SR-BEARING APATITE. American Mineralogist. 76. 1857–1862.83 indexed citations
2.
Hughes, John M., Maryellen Cameron, & Anthony N. Mariano. (1991). Rare-earth-element ordering and structural variations in natural rare-earth-bearing apatites. American Mineralogist. 76. 1165–1173.171 indexed citations
3.
Hughes, John M., Maryellen Cameron, & Kevin D. Crowley. (1990). Crystal structures of natural ternary apatites; solid solution in the Ca5(PO4)3 X(X = F, OH, Cl) system. American Mineralogist. 75. 295–304.93 indexed citations
Cameron, Maryellen, Shigeho Sueno, J. J. Papike, & C. T. Prewitt. (1983). High temperature crystal chemistry of K and Na fluor-richterites. American Mineralogist. 68. 924–943.39 indexed citations
10.
Cameron, Maryellen & J. J. Papike. (1981). Structural and chemical variations in pyroxenes. 66. 1–50.251 indexed citations
11.
Cameron, Maryellen & James J. Papike. (1980). Crystal chemistry of silicate pyroxenes. Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry. 7(1). 5–92.97 indexed citations
Sueno, Shigeho, Maryellen Cameron, J. J. Papike, & C. T. Prewitt. (1973). The high temperature crystal chemistry of tremolite. American Mineralogist. 58. 649–664.57 indexed citations
19.
Cameron, Maryellen & G. V. Gibbs. (1973). The Crystal Structure and Bonding of Fluor-Tremolite: A Comparison with Hydroxyl Tremolite. American Mineralogist. 58. 879–888.28 indexed citations
20.
Cameron, Maryellen, Shigeho Sueno, C. T. Prewitt, & J. J. Papike. (1973). High-Temperature Crystal Chemistry of Acmite, Diopside, Hedenbergite Jadeite, Spodumene and Ureyite. American Mineralogist. 58. 594–618.352 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.