Mary P. Harper

2.7k total citations
107 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Mary P. Harper is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary P. Harper has authored 107 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 92 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 17 papers in Signal Processing and 14 papers in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in Mary P. Harper's work include Natural Language Processing Techniques (71 papers), Topic Modeling (44 papers) and Speech Recognition and Synthesis (38 papers). Mary P. Harper is often cited by papers focused on Natural Language Processing Techniques (71 papers), Topic Modeling (44 papers) and Speech Recognition and Synthesis (38 papers). Mary P. Harper collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and France. Mary P. Harper's co-authors include Andreas Stolcke, Zhongqiang Huang, Yang Liu, Elizabeth Shriberg, Siripong Potisuk, Mari Ostendorf, Dustin Hillard, Jack Gandour, E. Shriberg and Wen Wang and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

In The Last Decade

Mary P. Harper

101 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mary P. Harper United States 26 1.4k 272 231 180 76 107 1.7k
Wayne Ward United States 29 2.4k 1.7× 338 1.2× 134 0.6× 202 1.1× 55 0.7× 100 2.8k
Klaus Zechner United States 22 1.3k 0.9× 263 1.0× 182 0.8× 101 0.6× 106 1.4× 81 1.6k
Stanley F. Chen United States 15 2.2k 1.6× 295 1.1× 49 0.2× 252 1.4× 34 0.4× 22 2.5k
Michael Riley United States 27 2.0k 1.4× 724 2.7× 196 0.8× 197 1.1× 24 0.3× 103 2.3k
Francisco Casacuberta Spain 25 1.8k 1.3× 170 0.6× 54 0.2× 468 2.6× 80 1.1× 179 2.2k
Steve Cassidy Netherlands 14 377 0.3× 129 0.5× 258 1.1× 66 0.4× 77 1.0× 74 766
Murat Saraçlar Türkiye 26 2.1k 1.5× 783 2.9× 121 0.5× 187 1.0× 24 0.3× 134 2.4k
Thomas Hain United Kingdom 24 2.0k 1.4× 1.4k 5.2× 280 1.2× 236 1.3× 61 0.8× 187 2.3k
Chuck Wooters United States 21 1.6k 1.1× 1.1k 4.2× 145 0.6× 176 1.0× 60 0.8× 51 2.0k
Jean‐Luc Gauvain France 24 2.1k 1.5× 1.2k 4.5× 191 0.8× 346 1.9× 30 0.4× 114 2.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Mary P. Harper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary P. Harper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary P. Harper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary P. Harper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary P. Harper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary P. Harper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary P. Harper. The network helps show where Mary P. Harper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary P. Harper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary P. Harper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary P. Harper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary P. Harper. Mary P. Harper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Harper, Mary P.. (2014). Learning from 26 Languages: Program Management and Science in the Babel Program. International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 1–1. 3 indexed citations
2.
Harper, Mary P., et al.. (2011). Generalized Interpolation in Decision Tree LM. Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 620–624.
3.
Huang, Zhongqiang & Mary P. Harper. (2011). Feature-Rich Log-Linear Lexical Model for Latent Variable PCFG Grammars. International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing. 219–227. 6 indexed citations
4.
Gormley, Matthew R., Adam Gerber, Mary P. Harper, & Mark Dredze. (2010). Non-Expert Correction of Automatically Generated Relation Annotations. North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 204–207. 11 indexed citations
5.
Chen, Lei & Mary P. Harper. (2009). Multimodal floor control shift detection. 15–22. 25 indexed citations
6.
Huang, Zhongqiang, Mary P. Harper, & Wen Wang. (2007). Mandarin Part-of-Speech Tagging and Discriminative Reranking. Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 1093–1102. 31 indexed citations
7.
Huang, Zhongqiang, Lei Chen, & Mary P. Harper. (2006). An Open Source Prosodic Feature Extraction Tool. Language Resources and Evaluation. 2116–2121. 25 indexed citations
8.
Bies, Ann, Stephanie Strassel, Kazuaki Mæda, et al.. (2006). Linguistic Resources for Speech Parsing. Language Resources and Evaluation. 629–634. 3 indexed citations
9.
Chen, Lei, Yang Liu, Mary P. Harper, Eduardo Habib Bechelane Maia, & Susan McRoy. (2004). Evaluating Factors Impacting the Accuracy of Forced Alignments in a Multimodal Corpus.. Language Resources and Evaluation. 8 indexed citations
10.
Liu, Yang, Elizabeth Shriberg, Andreas Stolcke, & Mary P. Harper. (2004). Using machine learning to cope with imbalanced classes in natural speech: evidence from sentence boundary and disfluency detection. 1525–1528. 15 indexed citations
11.
Liu, Yang, et al.. (2004). Comparing and Combining Generative and Posterior Probability Models: Some Advances in Sentence Boundary Detection in Speech. Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 144(7). 64–71. 27 indexed citations
12.
Wang, Wen & Mary P. Harper. (2002). The SuperARV language model. 10. 238–247. 43 indexed citations
13.
Harper, Mary P., et al.. (2000). The effectiveness of corpus-induced dependency grammars for post-processing speech. The COCOON platform (University of Paris). 102–109. 6 indexed citations
14.
Potisuk, Siripong, Mary P. Harper, & Jack Gandour. (1999). Classification of Thai tone sequences in syllable-segmented speech using the analysis-by-synthesis method. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing. 7(1). 95–102. 33 indexed citations
15.
Harper, Mary P., et al.. (1997). Analysis of Unknown Lexical Items using Morphological and Syntactic Information with the TIMIT Corpus.. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing. 2 indexed citations
16.
Harper, Mary P., et al.. (1994). An approach to multiply segmented constraint satisfaction problems. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 350–355. 3 indexed citations
17.
Harper, Mary P.. (1994). Stroing logical form in a shared-packed forest. Computational Linguistics. 20(4). 649–660. 2 indexed citations
18.
Harper, Mary P.. (1992). Ambiguous noun phrases in logical form. Computational Linguistics. 18(4). 419–465. 6 indexed citations
19.
Harper, Mary P., et al.. (1992). Log Time Parsing on the MasPar MP-1.. Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Processing. 209–217. 12 indexed citations
20.
Harper, Mary P.. (1988). Representing pronouns in logical form: computational constraints and linguistic evidence. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 712–717. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026