Mary M. Peet

4.0k citations
77 papers · 3.0k indexed · h-index 31
Topics
Plant responses to elevated CO2 (25 papers)Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control (20 papers)Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (15 papers)
Partner nations
United StatesIsraelJapan

In The Last Decade

Mary M. Peet

74 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Mary M. Peet
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Plant Science 2.6k
  • Molecular Biology 835
  • Global and Planetary Change 549
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 313
  • Atmospheric Science 266
Replace Leslie H. Fuchigami with:
Leslie H. Fuchigami United States
L. C. HO United Kingdom
Claudio Lovisolo Italy
Brian J. Atwell Australia
Donald R. Geiger United States
Dennis H. Greer Australia
Joseph C.V. Vu United States
Kenneth A. Shackel United States
Andrew Merchant Australia
Gretchen B. North United States
Mary M. Peet relative to Leslie H. Fuchigami United States Leslie H. Fuchigami's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Leslie H. Fuchigami · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary M. Peet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary M. Peet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary M. Peet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary M. Peet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary M. Peet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary M. Peet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary M. Peet. The network helps show where Mary M. Peet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary M. Peet

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary M. Peet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary M. Peet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary M. Peet. Mary M. Peet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Physiological plant disorders
1
2 1
3 57
4 192
5 122
6 0
7
The Bottom Line in Greenhouse Tomato Production
7
8 1
9 60
10 17
11 27
12 3
13 25
14
CO sub 2 enrichment of tomatoes: Relationship of foliar stress symptoms to starch concentrations and carbon exchange rates
2
15 3
16 31
17 130
18 13
19 2
20 13

About Mary M. Peet

Mary M. Peet is a scholar working on Plant Science, Soil Science and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 77 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant responses to elevated CO2 (25 papers), Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control (20 papers) and Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (2.6k citations), Global and Planetary Change (549 citations) and Soil Science (217 citations). Mary M. Peet has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Japan. Frequent co-authors include D. H. Willits, Suguru Sato, Judith F. Thomas, Richard G. Gardner, Shusei Sato, Paul J. Kramer, David T. Patterson, Frank J. Louws, Suzanne O’Connell and Cary L. Rivard. Their work appears in journals such as PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, Journal of Experimental Botany and Oecologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026