Mary Jo Braid‐Forbes

474 citations
9 papers · 301 indexed · h-index 7
Topics
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (4 papers)Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (3 papers)Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (3 papers)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

Mary Jo Braid‐Forbes

9 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers

Mary Jo Braid‐Forbes
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 174
  • Surgery 140
  • Epidemiology 88
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 50
  • Biomedical Engineering 27
Replace Akshar V. Patel with:
Akshar V. Patel United States
Bilal Mahmood United States
Alexa J. Karkenny United States
Eileen Finerty United States
J. Brock Walker United States
Rudolf Reindl Canada
Marc D. Dyrszka United States
Steven Velkes Israel
Sang‐Hun Ko South Korea
Wolfram Teske Germany
Mary Jo Braid‐Forbes relative to Akshar V. Patel United States Akshar V. Patel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Akshar V. Patel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Jo Braid‐Forbes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Jo Braid‐Forbes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Jo Braid‐Forbes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Jo Braid‐Forbes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Jo Braid‐Forbes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Jo Braid‐Forbes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Jo Braid‐Forbes. The network helps show where Mary Jo Braid‐Forbes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Jo Braid‐Forbes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Jo Braid‐Forbes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Jo Braid‐Forbes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Jo Braid‐Forbes. Mary Jo Braid‐Forbes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 18
2 47
3 3
4 6
5 19
6 61
7 73
8 56
9 18

About Mary Jo Braid‐Forbes

Mary Jo Braid‐Forbes is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, having authored 9 papers that have together received 301 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (4 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (3 papers) and Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (174 citations), Surgery (140 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (50 citations). Mary Jo Braid‐Forbes has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel J. Lerner, Kevin F. Forbes, Charles A. Henrikson, M. Rizwan Sohail, Sigurd Berven, Urvij Modhia, Steven K. Takemoto, Michael H. Weber, Michael A. Ferguson and R. Grant Steen. Their work appears in journals such as Spine, The American Journal of Cardiology and Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026