Mary Ford

507 total citations
5 papers, 392 citations indexed

About

Mary Ford is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Dermatology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary Ford has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 392 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sensory Systems, 1 paper in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 1 paper in Dermatology. Recurrent topics in Mary Ford's work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (2 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers) and Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (1 paper). Mary Ford is often cited by papers focused on Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (2 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers) and Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (1 paper). Mary Ford collaborates with scholars based in United States. Mary Ford's co-authors include Leonard P. Rybak, George Preti, George R. Huggins, Richard L. Doty, Zhongzhen Nie, Craig Whitworth, Vickram Ramkumar, Gary L. Stiles, Sanjay B. Maggirwar and Andrew Dravnieks and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Molecular Pharmacology and Hearing Research.

In The Last Decade

Mary Ford

5 papers receiving 372 citations

Peers

Mary Ford
Jennings Xu United States
Chike Cao United States
Kimberly Aranda United States
Pascaline Aimé United States
Mary Ford
Citations per year, relative to Mary Ford Mary Ford (= 1×) peers Jennifer Spehr

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Ford. The network helps show where Mary Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Ford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Ford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Ford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Ford. Mary Ford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
1.
Nie, Zhongzhen, et al.. (1998). Oxidative Stress Increases A1 Adenosine Receptor Expression by Activating Nuclear Factor κB. Molecular Pharmacology. 53(4). 663–669. 109 indexed citations
2.
Ford, Mary, et al.. (1997). Expression and function of adenosine receptors in the chinchilla cochlea. Hearing Research. 105(1-2). 130–140. 53 indexed citations
3.
Ford, Mary, et al.. (1997). Up-regulation of adenosine receptors in the cochlea by cisplatin. Hearing Research. 111(1-2). 143–152. 56 indexed citations
4.
Dravnieks, Andrew, et al.. (1978). Comparison of odors directly and through profiling. Chemical Senses. 3(2). 191–225. 40 indexed citations
5.
Doty, Richard L., Mary Ford, George Preti, & George R. Huggins. (1975). Changes in the Intensity and Pleasantness of Human Vaginal Odors During the Menstrual Cycle. Science. 190(4221). 1316–1318. 134 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026