Mary Ellen Waithe

681 citations
22 papers · 192 indexed · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Mary Ellen Waithe

20 papers receiving 143 citations

Peers

Mary Ellen Waithe
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • History and Philosophy of Science 50
  • Religious studies 37
  • Philosophy 62
  • History 39
  • Research and Theory 2
Replace Ralph McInerny with:
Ralph McInerny United States
Nicolas Standaert Belgium
Henri de Lubac
Thomas Kselman United States
Catherine Pickstock United Kingdom
Michael Boylan United States
Walter Hooper
B. A. Gerrish United States
Ruth Harris United Kingdom
Langdon Gilkey United States
Mary Ellen Waithe relative to Ralph McInerny United States Ralph McInerny's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ralph McInerny · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Ellen Waithe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Ellen Waithe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Ellen Waithe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Ellen Waithe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Ellen Waithe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Ellen Waithe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Ellen Waithe. The network helps show where Mary Ellen Waithe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Mary Ellen Waithe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary Ellen Waithe Line = papers co-authored together Mary Ellen Waithe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20232
2
New Philosophy of Human Nature: Neither Known to nor Attained by the Great Ancient Philosophers, Which Will Improve Human Life and Health
20072
3
New philosophy of human nature
20072
4 20040
5 20040
6 20033
7
¡Fue Oliva o fue Miguel? Reconsiderando el caso Sabuco
20001
8
Contemporary women philosophers : 1900-today
19953
9 199515
10
Modern women philosophers, 1600-1900
19914
11 199116
12 19905
13
Medieval, Renaissance and Enlightenment women philosophers, A.D. 500-1600
19894
14 19893
15 19899
16 198910
17 19893
18
Ancient women philosophers, 600 B.C.-500 A.D.
19874
19 198750
20 19838

About Mary Ellen Waithe

Mary Ellen Waithe is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Religious studies and Pharmacy, having authored 22 papers that have together received 192 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (1 paper), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (1 paper), Torture, Ethics, and Law (1 paper), Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (1 paper) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (50 citations), Religious studies (37 citations), Philosophy (62 citations), History (39 citations) and Research and Theory (2 citations). Mary Ellen Waithe has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David T. Ozar, Muriel B. Ryden, Laura Duckett and Arthur L. Caplan. Their work appears in journals such as Hypatia, Journal of Nursing Education, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, The Hastings Center Report and International Journal of Law and Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026