Mary Ellen Rafferty

838 total citations
7 papers, 538 citations indexed

About

Mary Ellen Rafferty is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Nephrology and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary Ellen Rafferty has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 538 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Infectious Diseases, 2 papers in Nephrology and 2 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Mary Ellen Rafferty's work include Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (4 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (3 papers) and Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (2 papers). Mary Ellen Rafferty is often cited by papers focused on Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (4 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (3 papers) and Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (2 papers). Mary Ellen Rafferty collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Israel. Mary Ellen Rafferty's co-authors include Aldona L. Baltch, George Killgore, Fred C. Tenover, Dena Lyras, Matthew H. Samore, Paola C. DeGirolami, Suzanne M. Pear, Julian I. Rood, Stuart Johnson and Dale N. Gerding and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

In The Last Decade

Mary Ellen Rafferty

7 papers receiving 515 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mary Ellen Rafferty United States 7 324 207 160 109 80 7 538
A. Andremont France 7 217 0.7× 192 0.9× 280 1.8× 64 0.6× 143 1.8× 11 583
Jan Umphrey United States 10 137 0.4× 164 0.8× 284 1.8× 65 0.6× 86 1.1× 14 489
N.C. Weightman United Kingdom 13 181 0.6× 222 1.1× 119 0.7× 81 0.7× 50 0.6× 24 567
Loretta Fauerbach United States 9 128 0.4× 181 0.9× 223 1.4× 57 0.5× 55 0.7× 17 453
Stephen Parenteau United States 8 151 0.5× 91 0.4× 132 0.8× 40 0.4× 65 0.8× 9 402
Richard Flowers United States 10 208 0.6× 275 1.3× 163 1.0× 51 0.5× 41 0.5× 35 612
P. Longuet France 13 193 0.6× 287 1.4× 81 0.5× 84 0.8× 20 0.3× 43 486
Ana Hornero Spain 10 163 0.5× 87 0.4× 185 1.2× 76 0.7× 59 0.7× 16 460
Joseph J. Klimek United States 13 257 0.8× 189 0.9× 53 0.3× 71 0.7× 80 1.0× 20 561
Robert K. Pelz United States 12 484 1.5× 302 1.5× 36 0.2× 36 0.3× 126 1.6× 19 631

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Ellen Rafferty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Ellen Rafferty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Ellen Rafferty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Ellen Rafferty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Ellen Rafferty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Ellen Rafferty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Ellen Rafferty. The network helps show where Mary Ellen Rafferty may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Ellen Rafferty

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Ellen Rafferty. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Ellen Rafferty based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Ellen Rafferty. Mary Ellen Rafferty is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Johnson, Stuart, Matthew H. Samore, Kylie A. Farrow, et al.. (1999). Epidemics of Diarrhea Caused by a Clindamycin-Resistant Strain ofClostridium difficilein Four Hospitals. New England Journal of Medicine. 341(22). 1645–1651. 273 indexed citations
2.
Bopp, Lawrence H., et al.. (1998). Genetic Analysis of Multiple Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus Isolates Obtained Serially from Two Long-Term-Care Patients. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 36(7). 2105–2108. 13 indexed citations
3.
Rafferty, Mary Ellen, Aldona L. Baltch, Raymond P. Smith, et al.. (1998). Comparison of Restriction Enzyme Analysis, Arbitrarily Primed PCR, and Protein Profile Analysis Typing for Epidemiologic Investigation of an Ongoing Clostridium difficile Outbreak. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 36(10). 2957–2963. 16 indexed citations
4.
Rafferty, Mary Ellen, et al.. (1997). Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci in Stool Specimens Submitted for Clostridium difficile Cytotoxin Assay. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 18(5). 342–344. 21 indexed citations
5.
Rafferty, Mary Ellen, et al.. (1997). Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci in Stool Specimens Submitted for Clostridium difficile Cytotoxin Assay. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 18(5). 342–344. 19 indexed citations
6.
Mirro, Joseph, Bhaskar N. Rao, Mahesh Kumar, et al.. (1990). A comparison of placement techniques and complications of externalized catheters and implantable port use in children with cancer. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 25(1). 120–124. 73 indexed citations
7.
Mirro, Joseph, B. N. Rao, Dennis C. Stokes, et al.. (1989). A prospective study of Hickman/Broviac catheters and implantable ports in pediatric oncology patients.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 7(2). 214–222. 123 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026