Mary E. Kaplar

674 total citations
8 papers, 461 citations indexed

About

Mary E. Kaplar is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary E. Kaplar has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 461 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Clinical Psychology, 3 papers in Social Psychology and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Mary E. Kaplar's work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers) and Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (2 papers). Mary E. Kaplar is often cited by papers focused on Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers) and Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (2 papers). Mary E. Kaplar collaborates with scholars based in United States. Mary E. Kaplar's co-authors include Robert A. Carels, Amy Wachholtz, Kenneth I. Pargäment, Robin Frutchey, Annette Mahoney, Anne K. Gordon, Holly Cacciapaglia, Lynn A. Darby, Krista Konrad and Carissa Coit and has published in prestigious journals such as Health Psychology, Journal of Psychosomatic Research and Personal Relationships.

In The Last Decade

Mary E. Kaplar

8 papers receiving 440 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mary E. Kaplar United States	6	220	170	110	95	94	8	461
Abdullah S. Al‐Subaie Saudi Arabia	13	290 1.3×	67 0.4×	74 0.7×	55 0.6×	202 2.1×	23	505
Richard Clancy Australia	15	106 0.5×	107 0.6×	106 1.0×	40 0.4×	148 1.6×	33	692
Michael S. Dunn United States	11	129 0.6×	34 0.2×	57 0.5×	61 0.6×	68 0.7×	23	376
R. Lorraine Collins United States	8	99 0.5×	69 0.4×	45 0.4×	150 1.6×	52 0.6×	9	368
Jaroslava Kopčáková Slovakia	11	78 0.4×	64 0.4×	172 1.6×	45 0.5×	74 0.8×	33	365
Norman H. Rasmussen United States	12	141 0.6×	41 0.2×	55 0.5×	34 0.4×	101 1.1×	33	458
Rebecca A. Jones United Kingdom	13	238 1.1×	22 0.1×	148 1.3×	49 0.5×	49 0.5×	50	492
Christine N. May United States	10	85 0.4×	67 0.4×	89 0.8×	69 0.7×	31 0.3×	32	412
B. H. Kaplan United States	8	218 1.0×	307 1.8×	79 0.7×	107 1.1×	116 1.2×	10	549
Carissa Coit United States	8	158 0.7×	15 0.1×	135 1.2×	53 0.6×	56 0.6×	9	357

Countries citing papers authored by Mary E. Kaplar

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary E. Kaplar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary E. Kaplar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary E. Kaplar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary E. Kaplar

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary E. Kaplar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary E. Kaplar. The network helps show where Mary E. Kaplar may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary E. Kaplar

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary E. Kaplar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary E. Kaplar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary E. Kaplar. Mary E. Kaplar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Carels, Robert A., Lynn A. Darby, Holly Cacciapaglia, et al.. (2007). Using motivational interviewing as a supplement to obesity treatment: A stepped-care approach.. Health Psychology. 26(3). 369–374. 145 indexed citations

Kaplar, Mary E.. (2006). Lying Happily Ever After: Altruistic White Lies, Positive Illusions, and Relationship Satisfaction. OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network). 3 indexed citations

Mahoney, Annette, Robert A. Carels, Kenneth I. Pargäment, et al.. (2005). The Sanctification of the Body and Behavioral Health Patterns of College Students. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. 15(3). 221–238. 97 indexed citations

Carels, Robert A., Lynn A. Darby, Holly Cacciapaglia, et al.. (2005). Applying a stepped-care approach to the treatment of obesity. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 59(6). 375–383. 47 indexed citations

Mahoney, Annette, Robert A. Carels, Kenneth I. Pargäment, et al.. (2005). RESEARCH: "The Sanctification of the Body and Behavioral Health Patterns of College Students". International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. 15(3). 221–238. 104 indexed citations

Kaplar, Mary E. & Anne K. Gordon. (2004). The enigma of altruistic lying: Perspective differences in what motivates and justifies lie telling within romantic relationships. Personal Relationships. 11(4). 489–507. 38 indexed citations

Kaplar, Mary E., Amy Wachholtz, & William H. O’Brien. (2004). The Effect of Religious and Spiritual Interventions on the Biological, Psychological, and Spiritual Outcomes of Oncology Patients. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology. 22(1). 39–49. 24 indexed citations

Gordon, Anne K. & Mary E. Kaplar. (2002). A New Technique for Demonstrating the Actor-Observer Bias. Teaching of Psychology. 29(4). 301–303. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact